PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6541087

Multidisciplinary team functioning.

K E Kovitz·P Dougan·R Riese·J R Brummitt
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper advocates the need to move beyond interdisciplinary team composition as a minimum criterion for multidisciplinary functioning in child abuse treatment. Recent developments within the field reflect the practice of shared professional responsibility for detection, case management and treatment. Adherence to this particular model for intervention requires cooperative service planning and implementation as task related functions. Implicitly, this model also carries the potential to incorporate the supportive functioning essential to effective group process. However, explicit attention to the dynamics and process of small groups has been neglected in prescriptive accounts of multidisciplinary child abuse team organization. The present paper therefore focuses upon the maintenance and enhancement aspects of multidisciplinary group functioning. First, the development and philosophy of service for the Alberta Children's Hospital Child Abuse Program are reviewed. Second, composition of the team, it's mandate for service, and the population it serves are briefly described. Third, the conceptual framework within which the program functions is outlined. Strategies for effective group functioning are presented and the difficulties encountered with this model are highlighted. Finally, recommendations are offered for planning and implementing a multidisciplinary child abuse team and for maintaining its effective group functioning.

Explore related subjects

Child AbuseGroup ProcessesHumansInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K E Kovitz, P Dougan, R Riese, J R Brummitt. 1984. Multidisciplinary team functioning.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(84)90076-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma.

CONTEXT: Abusive head trauma (AHT) is a dangerous form of child abuse that can be difficult to diagnose in young children. OBJECTIVES: To determine how frequently AHT was previously missed by physicians in a group of abused children with head injuries and to determine factors associated with the unrecognized diagnosis. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of cases of head trauma presenting between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 1995. SETTING: Academic children's hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy-three children younger than 3 years with head injuries caused by abuse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics of head-injured children in whom diagnosis of AHT was unrecognized and the consequences of the missed diagnoses. RESULTS: Fifty-four (31.2%) of 173 abused children with head injuries had been seen by physicians after AHT and the diagnosis was not recognized. The mean time to correct diagnosis among these children was 7 days (range, 0-189 days). Abusive head trauma was more likely to be unrecognized in very young white children from intact families and in children without respiratory compromise or seizures. In 7 of the children with unrecognized AHT, misinterpretation of radiological studies contributed to the delay in diagnosis. Fifteen children (27.8%) were reinjured after the missed diagnosis. Twenty-two (40.7%) experienced medical complications related to the missed diagnosis. Four of 5 deaths in the group with unrecognized AHT might have been prevented by earlier recognition of abuse. CONCLUSION: Although diagnosing head trauma can be difficult in the absence of a history, it is important to consider inflicted head trauma in infants and young children presenting with nonspecific clinical signs.

Child Abuse↗