PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6547154

Lead factors for total mixed ration formulation.

Abstract

Lead factors are used in computerized ration formulation programs developed at Virginia Tech to increase milk production above a herd or group average for which total mixed rations are formulated for group feeding. These lead factors theoretically increase milk production for which the ration is formulated so 83% of the cows in a group will receive adequate or more than adequate nutrients from the ration. Two methods of calculating lead factors produced similar results. When test-day Dairy Herd Improvement records within a herd were not grouped by production, the average lead factor was 1.31 for one method [lead factor = (mean milk yield + one standard deviation)/mean milk yield] and 1.32 for the other [lead factor = (milk yield of 83rd percentile cow)/mean milk yield]. Grouping test-day records in each herd by milk production resulted in smaller lead factors for each group compared with lead factors for ungrouped herds. Changes of percentage of cows in each group in a herd resulted in different lead factors. Generally, groups with greater proportion of cows had larger lead factors. Season, herd size, and herd milk production slightly affected lead factors, but little improvement of estimation was gained by considering these variables.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C C Stallings, M L McGilliard. 1984. Lead factors for total mixed ration formulation.. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(84)81386-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assay and purity control of tetracycline, chlortetracycline and oxytetracycline in animal feeds and premixes by TLC densitometry with fluorescence detection.

Methods using TLC densitometry with fluorescence detection are described for the assay and purity control of tetracycline (TC), chlortetracycline (CTC), and oxytetracycline (OTC) in animal feeds and premixes. With a silica gel layer previously sprayed with 10% (m/v) sodium EDTA solution adjusted to pH 8.0 or 9.0, all the major impurities were separated from the main components and from each other. The mobile phase consisted of dichloromethane, methanol, and water. After development, the plate was dipped in a 30% (v/v) solution of liquid paraffin in hexane. Quantitation was realized by fluorescence densitometry at 400 nm. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) for tetracycline impurities is 0.8 microg/g, corresponding to 0.2% of the label claimed tetracycline (400 microg/g). The LOQ for impurities of tetracycline and chlortetracycline in premixes is 0.2% of the label-claimed TC (40 mg/g) and CTC (200 or 400 mg/g). The LOQ for impurities of oxytetracycline in a premix is 0.1% of the label claimed OTC (100 mg/g).

Animal Feed↗

Rapid pesticide analysis, in post-harvest plants used as animal feed, by low-pressure gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

A wide range of pesticides used to control pests in vegetables have been determined in agricultural plant waste from beans, watermelons, and melons grown in greenhouses located in a predominantly agricultural area in Southeast Spain (Almería). Analysis of the pesticides was carried out by low-pressure gas chromatography (LP-GC) with mass spectrometry in tandem (MS-MS) mode, after extraction of the lyophilized samples with dichloromethane. The influence of the sample matrix on the analysis was avoided by use of matrix-matched standards. Linearity, detection limit ( LOD), quantitation limit ( LOQ), recovery, and precision for each pesticide were calculated. The most frequently encountered pesticides were endosulfan (>73% of the analyzed samples) and buprofezin (>55% of the samples), followed by cypermethrin, pirimifos-methyl, bifentrin, and chlorpyrifos (>30% of the samples). The pesticide found at the highest concentration level was endosulfan (223.33 mg kg(-1)) in a watermelon sample.

Animal Feed↗

Feedstuffs as a vehicle of cattle exposure to Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica.

Feed has been reported as a vehicle for transmission of Salmonella enterica in cattle and several lines of evidence suggest that feed can be a vehicle for transmitting Escherichia coli O157:H7 as well. To show whether microbial contamination of feeds could contribute to the populations of S. enterica and E. coli O157:H7 on a farm, we compared isolates from feed samples to bovine fecal isolates from the same farm using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Four of 2365 component feed samples (0.2%) and 1 of 226 feed mill samples (0.4%) were positive for E. coli O157:H7. Twenty of 2405 (0.8%) component feed samples and none of 226 feed mill samples were positive for Salmonella. PFGE profiles from E. coli O157:H7 isolated from a component feed sample closely resembled that from a fecal isolate collected later from the same farm, and a similar observation was made of a Salmonella Tyhpimurium isolate from component feed on another farm. There were indistinguishable PFGE profiles from component feed Salmonella Tyhpimurium DT104 isolates and fecal isolates from the same farm. These results provide evidence for a role of cattle feed in transmission of E. coli O157:H7; S. enterica; cattle-bacteria.

Animal Feed↗