PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6547294

Lay perceptions of autopsy.

Abstract

The lay public's exposure to information on the purposes and value of the autopsy is sparse. When approached for consent to perform an autopsy, they are often indifferent and uncooperative. If the autopsy is worthy of revitalization as the ultimate medical consultation, pathologists must know what the general public is exposed to, what they think, and what their perceptions about autopsy are. There have been mass media and some specialized media contributions during the years 1977 through 1982. I studied the public's areas of concern regarding the topic and detailed the perceptions and unspoken thoughts of laymen. There are steps that can be taken to join the lay community and pathologists together in renewed efforts to revitalize the role of the autopsy while simultaneously educating the public about the advantages and needs of medical education.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H G Brown. 1984. Lay perceptions of autopsy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6547294/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Existence and pluralism: the rediscovery of Karl Jaspers.

Karl Jaspers has been recognized in psychiatry mostly for his influence on phenomenology and on certain aspects of psychopathology, such as our understanding of delusions. In this paper, I will highlight the need to rediscover Jaspers' work in terms of other important ideas that he can contribute to psychiatry, in particular the concepts of limit situations, transcendence and pluralism. Limit situations refer to the fact that human life is characterized by existential situations, or crises, which become opportunities for authentic existence. Transcendence refers to the notion that freedom is an important aspect of human existence and cannot be explained by purely scientific understanding or encompassed by any purely rationalistic system of thought. Pluralism is perhaps Jaspers' most original perspective, which has still failed to be adequately appreciated by the psychiatric profession. The idea here is that science means understanding the methods by which we obtain knowledge, along with the presuppositions and limits of those methods. Contemporary psychiatry has only a limited appreciation of Jaspers' work. In this paper, I attempt to describe these important concepts that can help us understand what we do in psychiatry, what we should be doing and why.

Attitude to Death↗