PubMed · 6550008
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M A Mathewson. 1983. Current vasodilator therapy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6550008/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) progression is closely linked to oxidative stress. 5-Oxoproline (5-OP), a product of glutathione degradation, is normally metabolized by 5-oxoprolinase (OPLAH) but accumulates when the gamma-glutamyl cycle is disrupted. Here, we investigated the clinical characteristics of circulating 5-OP, its proteomic correlates, and the associations to outcome in HF. METHODS: In serum of 823 BIOSTAT-CHF patients, 5-OP was quantified by validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and analyzed for associations with clinical outcomes. Proteomic correlates were identified across 355 OLINK proteins using stability selection with Minimax Concave Penalty regression. Mechanistic context was evaluated in a multi-comorbidity, large-animal cardio-kidney-metabolic (CKM) model with regional OPLAH assessment. RESULTS: Higher 5-OP was associated with worse renal function (eGFR declining across 5-OP tertiles, 67.9 to 60.2 mL/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.0012) and higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.11-2.17, p = 0.010). Per SD increase in log-5-OP, risk for the 2-year composite endpoint increased (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.53), with broadly similar associations across CKD strata (interaction p = 0.63). TGF-α was the most robust proteomic correlate (π = 0.70; empirical permutation p = 0.001). In CKM swine, circulating 5-OP was elevated and renal cortical OPLAH protein, but not cardiac OPLAH, was selectively reduced, consistent with a renal contribution to systemic 5-OP elevation. CONCLUSION: Circulating 5-OP identifies HF patients at higher risk and is robustly associated with TGF-α. In a translational swine model, selective loss of renal cortical OPLAH provides tissue context supporting a renal contribution to systemic 5-OP elevation in cardiorenal syndrome.
Evolving statistical concepts and innovative trial designs for heart failure (HF) clinical trials seek to improve the conduct, efficiency, and likelihood of meaningful evidence generation crucial for advancing therapeutic development and optimizing patient care. HF trials with conventional statistical frameworks often require large sample sizes, long follow-up times, and high cost to generate sufficient evidence. Novel statistical methodologies would be of interest if they could address these issues while retaining or enhancing the clinical relevance and reliability of results. The HFC (Heart Failure Collaboratory), comprising clinical investigators, clinicians, statisticians, patients, government representatives, payors, and industry collaborators, leads efforts to improve HF research methodologies. HFC discussions have included statistical concepts such as the estimand framework, HR drift, and analytic methods, including the win ratio and restricted mean survival time, that have not been used frequently in HF trials. The estimand framework encourages precise definition and alignment of trial objectives with trial design. The win ratio method attempts to incorporate and prioritize multiple clinically meaningful outcomes by using a hierarchy of clinical importance. The restricted mean survival time provides an alternative to the HR as a measure of therapeutic effect by quantifying the mean time gained or lost during a fixed time after randomization. This paper provides a critical review of some evolving HF trial design methodologies and statistical concepts for the HF community as discussed within the HFC. Our goal is to foster collaboration among diverse stakeholders and advance the development of effective treatments and improve patient care outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Because left ventricular assist devices have recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration to support the circulation of patients with end-stage heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation, these devices are increasingly being considered as a potential alternative to biologic cardiac replacement. The Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) trial is a multicenter study supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to compare long-term implantation of left ventricular assist devices with optimal medical management for patients with end-stage heart failure who require, but do not qualify to receive cardiac transplantation. METHODS: We discuss the rationale for conducting REMATCH, the obstacles to designing this and other randomized surgical trials, the lessons learned in conducting the multicenter pilot study, and the features of the REMATCH study design (objectives, target population, treatments, end points, analysis, and trial organization). CONCLUSIONS: We consider what will be learned from REMATCH, expectations for expanding the use of left ventricular assist devices, and future directions for assessing clinical procedures.