PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6571612

Choice as the basis for mentation. A dialectic approach to mental development.

Abstract

I propose to build on Robbins' new mind model for the primitive personalities a stronger base and a more clearcut development. The stronger base requires a clearer exposition of pleasure that includes the earliest choice an infant can make. Choice determines the beginning of the mind as a complex system of its own. Pleasure describes the motivational viewpoint. Taken together they will define the structure which constitutes the mind. I agree with Robbins that phenomenological psychic representation furnishes the building blocks for this developmental model but I see conflict in interstage development to be necessary to furnish the dynamism for growth and/or regression. Normal grandiosity is infantile pleasure in choice. I present pathological grandiosity from a new regressive viewpoint within the developmental framework. Robbins' case of N is used to illustrate these ideas. In addition I present some complex requirements for human object and self constancy to be achieved.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Z M Linnell. 1984. Choice as the basis for mentation. A dialectic approach to mental development.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6571612/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A compensation election for binary social choice.

We report experimental results examining the properties of a bidding mechanism, the "Compensation Election," which is designed to implement a simple binary choice between two options. We may think of the group decision problem as a choice between a new rule and the status quo. The rule and the status quo are each common outcomes that apply across all individuals, but the value or cost that they induce on each individual differs according to each individual's circumstances: some gain, some lose, and others are unaffected by a change to the new from the old. Rather than casting votes, each subject submits a bid reflecting his willingness to pay to induce the group to select one option and the amount he wishes to be paid if the alternative option is selected. The Compensation Election chooses the option that receives the highest sum of bids. We find that, although the Compensation Election allows subjects to strategically bid above their value (or even for the option they do not prefer), such behavior is not the norm. We also find that subjects' bids more truthfully reveal their values when there are more bidders in the election.

Choice Behavior↗

The effects of expanding patient choice of provider on waiting times: evidence from a policy experiment.

Long waiting times for inpatient treatment in the UK National Health Service have been a source of popular and political concern, and therefore a target for policy initiatives. In the London Patient Choice Project, patients at risk of breaching inpatient waiting time targets were offered the choice of an alternative hospital with a guaranteed shorter wait. This paper develops a simple theoretical model of the effect of greater patient choice on waiting times. It then uses a difference in difference econometric methodology to estimate the impact of the London choice project on ophthalmology waiting times. In line with the model predictions, the project led to shorter average waiting times in the London region and a convergence in waiting times amongst London hospitals.

Choice Behavior↗