PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6572509

Appendicectomy audit.

Abstract

Of 200 consecutive appendicectomies performed at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital the indications for operation were suspected acute appendicitis (65%), chronic or recurrent appendicitis (11.5%), interval appendicectomy (3%) and appendicectomies incidental to other operations (20.5%). Of those operated upon for suspected acute appendicitis, the appendix revealed acute inflammation pathologically in 64% of patients. Pathological changes occurred with the same frequency in both the incidental appendicectomy group and the chronic appendicitis group. Within the group with a provisional diagnosis of acute appendicitis there were marked variations in the documentation of peroperative symptoms, signs and investigations. On average 11.5 hours passed between the time these patients presented and when appendicectomy was performed. The patients spent an average of 6.4 days in hospital and only 33% had any documentation follow-up in the hospital records. Auditing systems can only be instituted in Australia if the structure of medical services is borne in mind. Adoption of overseas systems based on different patterns of medical care will add little to patient care.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B C McCaughan, J May. 1983. Appendicectomy audit.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1983.tb02403.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Quality control--results of the first survey of pediatric surgery in Hungary].

161 patients underwent appendectomy at the Surgical Unit of the Department Paediatrics, Medical School of Pécs, Hungary between 1. January, 1988 and 31. December, 1995. Biochemical results--sedimentation rate, CRP (C-reactive protein) and leucocytosis were compared to the operative findings as far as their predictive diagnostic value was concerned. The patients were grouped according to inflamed (n = 141) or non-inflamed appendix (n = 20). Based on the outcome of statistical analysis the author concluded, that there was no significant difference between the informations given by the above-mentioned biochemical results, regarding the strengthening of the preoperative diagnosis, also the combination of the data of the biochemistry tests did not help in deciding to operate on patients with suspected appendicitis. The changing policy and conditions of the health insurance in Hungary are forcing the medical doctors to analyse more frequently the effectiveness of their activity.

Appendectomy