PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 657635

Pathologic femoral shaft fractures comparing fixation techniques using cement.

Abstract

To determine the most stable mode of internal fixation for the pathologic femoral shaft fracture with extensive cortical destruction, 2 fixation techniques incorporating methylmethacrylate were compared. Osteotomies through standardized cortical defects were created in intact embalmed femora to simulate a standard pathologic fracture. Fixation obtained with either intramedullary Schneider rods or 28-hold ASIF plates, both using bone cement, was compared in torsion and bending. In torsion, plate-fixed femora failed at a mean load of 71.2 newton-meters compared to 26.8 newton-meters for the Schneider rod counterparts. In bending, plate-fixed bones at a mean load of 8133.9 newtons compared to 1921.4 newtons for rod-fixed femora. Fixation with double plates and methylmethacrylate was clearly more stable and allowed for immediate pain-free ambulation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J T Anderson, J M Erickson, R C Thompson, E Y Chao. Pathologic femoral shaft fractures comparing fixation techniques using cement.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/657635/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Preventing malrotation during intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures].

BACKGROUND: The problem of preventing malrotation after closed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures has not been solved yet. As clinical tests and radiologic criteria for intraoperative use provide little accuracy, the theoretical basis for a C-arm-based measurement of the femoral antetorsion was analysed. METHODS: The directions of femoral neck axis and condylar axis can be identified by the radiologic views "knee joint, lateral view" and "hip joint, axial view". The rotation of the C-arm in relation to a horizontal axis to achieve these views can be measured in degrees. Theoretically, the difference between these rotation angles could be used to calculate the antetorsion. Intact plastic femora (Sawbone) and a femoral shaft fracture model were used to research optical and geometrical phenomena that influence a direct measuring technique. RESULTS: Several geometrical phenomena were observed, making direct measurement with arithmetic corrective factors not recommendable. For practical reasons, a data table was created, correlating the difference between the two C-arm angles with true antetorsion. In an interobserver trial with 18 trauma surgeons, the method proved to achieve high accuracy with a maximum interobserver variation of 5 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: The method is easily reproducible, reliable and can be recommended to every surgeon. Due to the wide range of physiological antetorsion angles in different individuals, fair results can be expected controlling the rotation with standard value tables, and excellent results can be expected using bilateral measurement.

Femoral Fractures↗