PubMed · 6584767
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A D Holmes. 1984-03-14. Buprenorphine side effects.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6584767/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A rapid, sensitive, precise and accurate HPLC assay with UV detection was developed for the determination of buprenorphine (BN) in human plasma. This method involved a two-step extraction in the presence of clothiapine as internal standard. The compounds were chromatographied on a reversed-phase Spherisorb C8 column with a mobile phase consisting of 0.06 M KH2PO4/Na2HPO4 pH 6.4-acetonitrile-triethylamine-Pic B5 (520:480:0.5:15, v/v) and detected at 214 nm. The recovery of BN was greater than 94% with an intra-day relative standard deviation < or = 4.8% and an inter-day relative standard deviation < or = 14.6% at any studied level. Studies of drug stability during sample storage at -20 degrees C and at +4 degrees C did not show any significative degradation of BN. This method was successfully applied to explore the overdose state of heroin-dependent subjects treated by high-dose BN.
AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an 8 mg/day sublingual dose of buprenorphine in the maintenance treatment of heroin addicts by comparison with a 1 mg/day dose over a 16-week treatment period. As a secondary objective, outcomes were determined concurrently for patients treated with two other dose levels. DESIGN: Patients were randomized to four dosage groups and treated double-blind. SETTING: Twelve outpatient opiate maintenance treatment centers throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and thirty-nine women and 497 men who met the DSM-III-R criteria for opioid dependence and were seeking treatment. INTERVENTION: Patients received either 1, 4, 8 or 16 mg/day of buprenorphine and were treated in the usual clinical context, including a 1-hour weekly clinical counseling session. MEASUREMENT: Retention in treatment, illicit opioid use as determined by urine toxicology, opioid craving and global ratings by patient and staff. Safety outcome measures were provided by clinical monitoring and by analysis of the reported adverse events. FINDINGS: Outcomes in the 8 mg group were significantly better than in the 1 mg group in all four efficacy domains. No deaths occurred in either group. The 8 mg group did not show an increase in the frequency of adverse events. Most reported adverse effects were those commonly seen in patients treated with opioids. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the safety and efficacy of buprenorphine and suggest that an adequate dose of buprenorphine will be a useful addition to pharmacotherapy.
Methadone and buprenorphine, widely used in the treatment of opioid abuse, are metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4, while fluoxetine and fluvoxamine, both selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, are known to be P450 2D6 and 3A4 inhibitors in vitro. This study deals with the in vitro interactions between methadone or buprenorphine and fluoxetine or fluvoxamine. Fluoxetine inhibited methadone N-demethylation (Ki = 55 microM), but conversely did not inhibit buprenorphine dealkylation. Norfluoxetine inhibited the metabolism of both methadone and buprenorphine metabolisms (Ki 13 and 100 microM, respectively). Fluvoxamine inhibited methadone N-demethylation with a Ki of 7 microM and buprenorphine dealkylation, uncompetitively, with a Ki of 260 microM. Finally, these results suggest that care should be taken when selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are administered in the treatment of drug craving. This is particularly true in the case of fluvoxamine which is more potent than fluoxetine in inhibiting methadone and buprenorphine metabolism.