PubMed · 6595388
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D F Bowers. 1984. Ethics in dentistry: devising a code for all reasons.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6595388/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Two hundred and sixteen Lightspeed instruments were evaluated microscopically for the presence of corrosion, surface debris, and alloy defects. The instruments were assessed morphometrically for consistency of physical design and dimensions by measuring and analyzing eight parameters of the instrument pilot tips, heads, and shafts. Results from visual inspection showed that none of the instruments were corroded; 23 presented surface porosities, and 17 had sharp strips of alloy. Data obtained by morphometric analysis indicated the mean diameter of the head of only 7 of 18 sizes met the +/- 0.02 mm allowable tolerance set forth by the American Dental Association (ADA) Specification No. 28. Observation and video analysis indicated that instruments of the same size adhere to the same basic design, but that morphometric variations do exist. The visual and intersize analysis indicated that the Lightspeed is not an instrument of any one determined shape that changes only in diameter. Rather, it is a series of instruments that show gradual shifts in both size and shape as the instrument size increases. Lightspeed instruments are a new type of nickel-titanium endodontic instrument that cannot be evaluated using the standards proposed by the American National Standards Institute/ADA Specification No. 28 for files and reamers.
The tensile and tear properties of highly extensible latex are sensitive to specimen shape. Three specimen shapes (ASTM D412 Die C dumbbell tensile specimen, rectangular tensile specimen with 1.74 mm hole, and ASTM D624 Die C tear specimen) were evaluated for proposed ANSI/ADA specification #90 for dental dams. Fresh and aged dental dams from two manufacturers (Aseptico and Hygenic) in three weights (thin, medium, and heavy) and from two other manufacturers (Ivory and Ivoclar) in one weight (medium) were tested. Means and standard deviations of 10 specimens for tensile strength (MPa), elongation (%), and tear strength (kN/m) are included herein. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance. Means were compared by a Tukey-Kramer interval calculated at the 0.05 significance level. The use of the dumbbell and tear specimens for the evaluation of dental dam should be reconsidered. The rectangular specimen with a hole is recommended for use in the proposed specification because of its sensitivity to condition (fresh versus aged) and manufacturer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.