PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6598017

Disability rating scales in multiple sclerosis.

Abstract

The International Federation of Multiple Sclerosis Societies has been attempting to define a Minimal Data Set for multiple sclerosis following the tripartite scheme of the World Health Organization, with one rating scheme for neurologic signs, one for physical disabilities, and one for the societal impact of the disease. Current recommendations are the Disability Status Scale or the Expanded DSS plus Functional Systems for the first, Incapacity Status Scale of 16 items for the second, and Environmental Status Scale of 7 items for the third. All are graded in an ordinal (rank) scale from 0 (normal) with larger numbers for greater involvement. ISS scores range from 0-4 and ESS from 0-5 for each item. The only part of this scheme useful for measurement in clinical trials is the (E)DSS + FS. The DSS ranges from 0-10; EDSS subdivides each DSS grade 1-9 into two. FS are pyramidal, cerebellar, brain stem, sensory, bowel and bladder, visual, cerebral, or other; all save the last are graded 0-5 or 0-6. The DSS correlates well with both frequency and severity of involvement in all FS, which in turn represent a coded standard neurologic examination.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J F Kurtzke. 1984. Disability rating scales in multiple sclerosis.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb14805.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Methods of evaluation of musician's dystonia: critique of measurement tools.

Musician's dystonia is associated with significant morbidity. To assess treatment options, accurate and precise measurements of disease severity are critical. We describe current methods of quantitatively measuring musician's dystonia of the upper extremity including subjective, objective, and automated methods. The degree to which these methods satisfy rigorous measurement criteria, including their reliability, validity, responsiveness to treatment, and practicality, is examined. We report that most of these methods have not been properly evaluated. Therefore, treatment trials based on these methods are difficult to interpret.

Disability Evaluation↗

[Compensation for tinnitus in private accident insurance].

According to the provisions of private accident insurance, mental or psychic reactions are excluded from compensation. Until now, tinnitus was taken as fully psychic and therefore excluded. In two recently published judgments of the Federal Supreme Court in Germany the assessment of tinnitus in private accident insurance and particularly the exclusion clause section sign 2 Abs. 4 AUB 88 has been newly defined. According to this actual jurisdiction the compensation of tinnitus could be possible, when as physical underlying reason a proved harm in the inner ear or the auditory pathway (hearing loss), which can be traced back to the accident according to the rules of causality. This leads to the question how Tinnitus could be compensated without modification of the general terms and conditions of the private accident insurance. A compensating table is proposed, which recognizes the somatic (physical) part of tinnitus and is based on medical and scientific findings of the relation between hearing loss and tinnitus.

Disability Evaluation↗