PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6598198

DNA methylation versus gene expression.

A P Bird
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Vertebrate DNA is methylated at a high proportion of cytosine residues in the sequence CpG, and it has been suggested that the distribution of methylated and non-methylated CpGs in a given cell type influences the pattern of gene expression in those cells. Since a DNA methylation pattern is normally transmitted faithfully to daughter cells via cell division, this idea suggests an origin for stable, clonally inherited patterns of gene expression. This article discusses some of the current evidence for a relationship between DNA methylation and gene expression. Although the evidence is incomplete, it appears already that the relationship is variable: transcription of some genes is repressed by the presence of 5-methylcytosine at certain CpGs, and may be controlled by methylation, while transcription of other genes is indifferent to methylation. In attempting to explain this variability it is helpful to adopt an evolutionary perspective.

Explore related subjects

5-MethylcytosineAnimalsCytosineDNADNA ReplicationDNA, RibosomalDinucleoside PhosphatesGene Expression RegulationGenesMethylationOligonucleotidesTranscription, GeneticXenopus laevisJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A P Bird. 1984. DNA methylation versus gene expression.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6598198/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2016

A probabilistic generative model for quantification of DNA modifications enables analysis of demethylation pathways.

We present a generative model, Lux, to quantify DNA methylation modifications from any combination of bisulfite sequencing approaches, including reduced, oxidative, TET-assisted, chemical-modification assisted, and methylase-assisted bisulfite sequencing data. Lux models all cytosine modifications (C, 5mC, 5hmC, 5fC, and 5caC) simultaneously together with experimental parameters, including bisulfite conversion and oxidation efficiencies, as well as various chemical labeling and protection steps. We show that Lux improves the quantification and comparison of cytosine modification levels and that Lux can process any oxidized methylcytosine sequencing data sets to quantify all cytosine modifications. Analysis of targeted data from Tet2-knockdown embryonic stem cells and T cells during development demonstrates DNA modification quantification at unprecedented detail, quantifies active demethylation pathways and reveals 5hmC localization in putative regulatory regions.

5-Methylcytosine↗
PubMed2006

Directionality of point mutation and 5-methylcytosine deamination rates in the chimpanzee genome.

BACKGROUND: The pattern of point mutation is important for studying mutational mechanisms, genome evolution, and diseases. Previous studies of mutation direction were largely based on substitution data from a limited number of loci. To date, there is no genome-wide analysis of mutation direction or methylation-dependent transition rates in the chimpanzee or its categorized genomic regions. RESULTS: In this study, we performed a detailed examination of mutation direction in the chimpanzee genome and its categorized genomic regions using 588,918 SNPs whose ancestral alleles could be inferred by mapping them to human genome sequences. The C-->T (G-->A) changes occurred most frequently in the chimpanzee genome. Each type of transition occurred approximately four times more frequently than each type of transversion. Notably, the frequency of C-->T (G-->A) was the highest in exons among the genomic categories regardless of whether we calculated directly, normalized with the nucleotide content, or removed the SNPs involved in the CpG effect. Moreover, the directionality of the point mutation in exons and CpG islands were opposite relative to their corresponding intergenic regions, indicating that different forces govern the nucleotide changes. Our analysis suggests that the GC content is not in equilibrium in the chimpanzee genome. Further quantitative analysis revealed that the 5-methylcytosine deamination rates at CpG sites were highly dependent on the local GC content and the lengths of SNP flanking sequences and varied among categorized genomic regions. CONCLUSION: We present the first mutational spectrum, estimated by three different approaches, in the chimpanzee genome. Our results provide detailed information on recent nucleotide changes and methylation-dependent transition rates in the chimpanzee genome after its split from the human. These results have important implications for understanding genome composition evolution, mechanisms of point mutation, and other genetic factors such as selection, biased codon usage, biased gene conversion, and recombination.

5-Methylcytosine↗
PubMed2006

A type IV modification dependent restriction nuclease that targets glucosylated hydroxymethyl cytosine modified DNAs.

The Escherichia coli CT596 prophage exclusion genes gmrS and gmrD were found to encode a novel type IV modification-dependent restriction nuclease that targets and digests glucosylated (glc)-hydroxymethylcytosine (HMC) DNAs. The protein products GmrS (36 kDa) and GmrD (27 kDa) were purified and found to be inactive separately, but together degraded several different glc-HMC modified DNAs (T4, T2 and T6). The GMR enzyme is able to degrade both alpha-glucosy-HMC T4 DNA and beta-glucosyl-HMC T4 DNA, whereas no activity was observed against non-modified DNAs including unmodified T4 cytosine (C) DNA or non-glucosylated T4 HMC DNA. Enzyme activity requires NTP, favors UTP, is stimulated by calcium, and initially produces 4 kb DNA fragments that are further degraded to low molecular mass products. The enzyme is inhibited by the T4 phage internal protein I* (IPI*) to which it was found to bind. Overall activities of the purified GmrSD enzyme are in good agreement with the properties of the cloned gmr genes in vivo and suggest a restriction enzyme specific for sugar modified HMC DNAs. IPI* thus represents a third generation bacteriophage defense against restriction nucleases of the Gmr type.

5-Methylcytosine↗