PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 662925

Evaluation of patient education programs.

Abstract

Patient education is a vital component of comprehensive quality care for patients with chronic disease. Rarely is patient instruction evaluated, however, in terms of its effectiveness and efficiency. This article presents a rationale for evaluation of patient education and lists several benefits of evaluation to the clinician. A model for evaluation and evaluation activities is described for both the process of developing a patient education program and evaluating its results. Application of this model and examples of the use of evaluation activities are demonstrated in a "real world" experience. The description of a formal patient education program for rheumatoid arthritis patients in a general hospital setting illustrates the usefulness of evaluation in developing and carrying out effective patient education.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P H Rand. 1978. Evaluation of patient education programs.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj%2F58.7.851

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗