PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6629461

Hemodynamic response: decrease in cardiac output vs reduction in vascular resistance.

Abstract

From a hemodynamic point of view, an adequate response to antihypertensive therapy would be restoration of a normal circulatory system. In most patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension considered to need drug therapy, the cardinal hemodynamic disturbance is an increased total peripheral resistance (TPR) and a normal or reduced cardiac output (CO). During a 10- to 17-year follow-up of untreated hypertensives, a gradual increase in TPR, increase in MAP, and a decrease in CO and stroke volume (SV) were seen. Hemodynamic responses to chronic drug therapy were studied at rest and during exercise in 250 men with mild to moderate essential hypertension in WHO Stage I. A significant reduction in TPR was seen on thiazide diuretics, nifedipine and verapamil, but there was no increase of subnormal CO or SV. A greater normalization of central hemodynamics was achieved by prazosin, which induced a reduction in TPR and an increase in CO and SV, particularly during exercise. In contrast, beta-blocker therapy was associated with a chronic reduction in CO and heart rate (HR) and usually no reduction in TPRI below pretreatment values. The chronic CO reduction was associated with an increase in arteriovenous oxygen difference. In 14 patients with therapy-resistant hypertension, a marked increase in TPR was found. Captopril induced a reduction in TPR with rest and exercise, and also a reduction in cardiac output. Prolonged therapy for 5 years with beta-blockers did maintain blood pressure control, but with no further decrease in TPR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Lund-Johansen. Hemodynamic response: decrease in cardiac output vs reduction in vascular resistance.. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.5.5_pt_2.iii49

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Circadian rhythm of blood pressure in hypertension treated with enalapril and other drugs].

Twenty-four-hour "ambulatory blood pressure monitoring" (ABPM) was performed during the day at every 30 min and during the night at every 60 min in 38 persons admitted to the hospital. The subjects were divided into four groups: Group 1. healthy subjects (11); Group 2. essential hypertensive patients (7) before and during enalapril treatment; Group 3. patients with essential hypertension (10) treated with different antihypertensive drugs and Group 4. renal patients treated as in Group 3. Normal circadian rhythm was found in the healthy subjects and in the patients with essential hypertension, but no rhythm could be demonstrated in the renal patients. The high blood pressure decreased in response to enalapril in 7 patients without any decrease in the circadian rhythm. It was concluded that antihypertensive therapy does not abolish the circadian rhythm if there is any--and does not restore if it is lacking. The chances of the diagnostic use of circadian blood pressure rhythm are not impaired by the antihypertensive treatment.

Antihypertensive Agents

Comparison of high-performance liquid chromatography and high-performance capillary electrophoresis for the determination of cicletanine in plasma.

A sensitive and selective high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE) procedure was developed for the determination of total cicletanine in human plasma. The procedure consisted in extraction of the drug with diethyl ether and analysis by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography in a fused-silica capillary using sodium dodecyl sulphate in the run buffers and ultraviolet detection. The concentrations of cicletanine obtained by this method were compared with those obtained by a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method used routinely. The within-run precision of the methods, expressed as relative standard deviation, ranged from 1.6 to 7.8% for HPLC and from 6.4 to 11.1% for HPCE. Both methods showed an adequate level of accuracy; the relative errors ranged from 0.02 to 3.25% for HPLC and from 0.21 to 2.90% for HPCE. The HPCE method required less than half the time taken by the HPLC method, making HPCE a useful alternative technique for the routine determination of cicletanine in plasma. Both methods were used to follow the time course of total cicletanine in human plasma after a single oral therapeutic dose of the drug.

Antihypertensive Agents