PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6630634

Dose reduction through variable dose CT scanning: optimality of the filtered backprojection algorithm.

Abstract

A novel approach to patient radiation dose reduction in X-ray computed tomography (CT) (variable dose scanning) is proposed and evaluated. This technique spares radiosensitive tissues from unnecessary radiation if they are not in the area of immediate clinical interest. Specifically evaluated is the potential for reduction of dose to the eye and active bone marrow in head transmission CT. Using computer simulations, doses are calculated for an easily implementable two level exposure variation, and results are discussed for the fully optimized case in which the intensities of all pencil beams are independently variable. Dose reductions of more than 80% in peak dose are possible in head scanning. To determine whether the filtered backprojection algorithm is optimal in terms of signal-to-noise ratio of the final images for this novel scanning technique, a Cramer-Rao lower bound to noise in the image (which is independent of reconstruction algorithm) is derived and calculated for several types of scan. The bound uses the photon distributions determined from mathematical optimization and is compared with the actual noise of the reconstructions. The comparison indicates that little if any improvement can be expected in signal-to-noise ratio using reconstruction algorithms other than the filtered backprojection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Stanton, O Tretiak. 1983. Dose reduction through variable dose CT scanning: optimality of the filtered backprojection algorithm.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-198312000-00021

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Film-screen systems: sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision system to Kodak T-Mat/RA system.

BACKGROUND: In 1995, Eastman Kodak Company (Rochester, N.Y.) marketed the Ektavision Extraoral Imaging Film and Screen System. It produced high-resolution images by keeping the light emitted by intensifying screens from "punching through" one emulsion layer on the film to another. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the experiment were (1) to compare the sensitometric properties of the Ektavision system to its predecessor, the T-Mat/RA system and (2) to determine whether films and screens of the Ektavision and the T-Mat/RA systems could be interchanged without clinically changing the sensitometric properties. Ektavision and Lanex Regular intensifying screens were used in combination with Ektavision, T-Mat G/RA, T-Mat L/RA, and T-Mat H/RA films. RESULTS: The results showed that the Ektavision film was slightly slower than the T-Mat G/RA film no matter what type of screen was used. The type of screen used had little effect on inherent contrast or exposure latitude. The Ektavision film had approximately similar inherent contrast as the T-Mat G/RA film but less than that of the T-Mat H/RA film; its latitude was less than that of the T-Mat L/RA film. The manufacturer does not recommend combining T-Mat/RA film with Ektavision screens or Lanex Regular screens with Ektavision film because of a possible reduction in image resolution. But this mismatch did not clinically affect inherent contrast and exposure latitude; however, film speed was slightly affected. CONCLUSIONS: The Ektavision system is the result of advanced technology that produces images of high resolution. The high-resolution Ektavision film is slightly slower than the T-Mat G/RA film but is equivalent to it in its contrast and latitude. Therefore when changing from the combination of T-Mat/RA film plus Lanex Regular screens to that of Ektavision film plus Ektavision screens, a slight increase in x-radiation exposure should be made.

Radiation Dosage