PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6652164

Temporal integration deficit in visual information processing by chronic schizophrenics.

Abstract

The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate speed of visual information processing of chronic schizophrenics and normal subjects. Retarded information processing by schizophrenics has been attributed to a dysfunction at the earliest stage of processing. In the present study, by using a backward-masking paradigm and varying target duration we were able to evaluate whether schizophrenic and normals conform to an iconic or visual persistence theory of processing. Also, we evaluated whether schizophrenic and normal information processing is a function of the total time a stimulus is available for viewing prior to disruption (stimulus onset asynchrony, SOA), or whether it is the time following the stimulus offset prior to disruption by the mask (interstimulus interval, ISI). The former conforms more closely to a visual persistence and the latter to an iconic notion of processing. The results indicate that schizophrenics and normals conform to the processing of information as a function of the SOA as opposed to ISI. However, schizophrenic processing during the period of temporal integration (i.e., up to 130 msec) was significantly retarded when compared to normal controls. These findings suggest that for chronic schizophrenics, visual signals associated with target processing during the temporal integration period have either decayed at a slower rate or are more unstable than those of normals. Also discussed is the compatability of these findings with a visual persistence as opposed to an iconic model of information processing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B D Schwartz, D K Winstead, B Adinoff. 1983. Temporal integration deficit in visual information processing by chronic schizophrenics.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6652164/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding.

What are the elementary features that the brain uses to bind spatially distinct parts in a visual scene into an unitary percept of an "object"? The Gestalt psychologists emphasized the extent to which motion, colour, luminance or spatial arrangement contribute towards object formation. Little is known about the role of time per se, rather than motion, in constituting an object. In particular, does the visibility or saliency of an object change if the various parts making up the object are not presented simultaneously? Using a simple experimental design, we show that very small spatial displacements can significantly influence the saliency of an object while large temporal asynchrony has no significant effect.

Form Perception

Object representation by cores: identifying and representing primitive spatial regions.

We propose a model of the spatial visual processes underlying the identification and representation of the shape of primitive spatial regions. We propose that a region's boundaries are sensed at multiple scales by boundariness detectors that give graded responses, that stimulated boundariness detectors of similar scale, sigma, connect to one another across a distance that is proportional to their scale, and that they connect via cores, where a core encodes the middles and widths of the region and hence is a trace in (chi, gamma, sigma), i.e. 3-D scale space.

Form Perception

Constraints on the processing of rolling motion: the curtate cycloid illusion.

When a wheel rolls along a flat surface, a point on its perimeter traces a cycloid trajectory, forming a sequence of adjacent semicircle-like scallops. However, when mentally visualizing this point's trajectory, participants erroneously describe the point's path as looping back on itself between each scallop or phase of the cycloid, a phenomenon called the curtate cycloid illusion. The studies supported the hypothesis that the curtate cycloid illusion occurs because the cognitive system sometimes does not have sufficient resources for simultaneously processing 2 components of the motion: its translation and its rotation about its current instant center. Four experiments using computer-animated rolling wheels found that participants who were high in spatial ability were less susceptible to the curtate cycloid illusion than were low-spatial participants, that high-spatial participants were not susceptible to the illusion if they could control the animated wheel display, and that the illusion was substantially decreased if the opportunity to compute instant centers was reduced.

Form Perception