Anaesthesia and pacemaker.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the feasibility of coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart without interruption of native coronary blood flow using a novel anastomosis site restraining device. BACKGROUND: Recently, an end-to-side bypass technique was described that does not require interruption of flow in the recipient artery. METHODS: By means of a suction device ("Octopus"), in 31 pigs the epicardium was grasped and immobilized through an arm contraption fixed to the operating table. In the first 15 consecutive pigs (study I), the two-dimensional motion of an epicardial beacon was monitored. In 16 subsequent pigs (study II), an internal mammary artery was grafted under the microscope in two steps to a proximal coronary artery segment, without cardiopulmonary bypass. First, the internal mammary artery was sutured end-to-side to the outside of the coronary artery. Secondly, an orifice was punched in the partitioning coronary wall by an excimer laser catheter introduced through a temporary side-branch of the internal mammary artery. RESULTS: Study II: During 43 suction periods in four anastomosis areas, immobilization was achieved for 15 to 169 min (>30 h in total) in 13 open- and 9 closed-chest procedures without hemodynamic deterioration. The area circumscribed by the edges of the beacon trajectory (area in which the anastomosis is to be tracked) was reduced from 73.0 +/- 43.0 mm(2) (mean +/- SD) to 1.3 +/- 0.5 mm(2) (p<0.001) in the open-chest and to 0.2 +/- 0.2 mm(2) in the closed-chest procedure. At 6 weeks, no myocardial or coronary suction lesions were found. Study II: Nonocclusive anastomosis surgery required 25 +/- 3 min. No leakage, serious arrhythmias, graft closure or hemodynamic deterioration occurred during the procedure or for 2 h after ligating the coronary artery proximally. At 6 weeks, all seven grafts were patent. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary bypass on the beating heart without interruption of coronary flow is feasible. In both open- and in closed-chest procedures, the "Octopus" reduced anastomosis site motion to about 1 X 1 mm without adverse consequences.

Anesthesia, General↗

PubMed1996

The effect of anesthesia type on needle localization breast biopsy: another point of view.

BACKGROUND: Efforts directed at early detection of breast cancer have resulted in an increased incidence of nonpalpable mammographic lesions that warrant excisional biopsy. The most common localization method is by use of the hook wire technique, or needle localization biopsy. Although much has been written about the localization technique, the impact of the method of anesthesia on the accuracy of the biopsy and especially on the completeness of the excision has not been clarified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 450 needle localization breast biopsies to determine whether the type of anesthesia (local versus general) influenced the accuracy and completeness of the biopsy. We compared 153 biopsies performed under local anesthesia to 297 done under general anesthesia. RESULTS: The use of local versus general anesthesia did not affect accuracy; however, it did determine the inability to achieve clean margins (27.6% versus 7.3%, respectively, P <0.02). It was more difficult to excise completely specimens located deeper than 3 cm in the breast, when the localizing needle travelled more than 3 cm, and when the lesions were of the microcalcification mammographic pattern. CONCLUSIONS: For lesions mammographically suspicious for malignancy, mainly those located deeper than 3 cm, general anesthesia is preferred.

Anesthesia, General↗