PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6691547

The gastrinoma triangle: operative implications.

Abstract

Operative experience with 45 gastrinoma patients has led to the identification of an anatomic area where occult tumors can be discovered and where excision of these tumors had led to apparent cure. Of 36 patients with histologically confirmed gastrinomas, 27 patients (75 percent) had obvious and 9 patients (25 percent) had occult tumors. All nine occult lesions were found within an anatomic triangle defined by the junction of the cystic and common bile ducts superiorly, the junction of the second and third portions of the duodenum inferiorly, and the junction of the neck and body of the pancreas medially. Although occult tumors from three patients (in the lymph nodes in two patients and in the duodenum in one patient) were removed primarily for histologic diagnosis, postoperative serum gastrin levels have remained within the normal range (follow-up of 86 to 99 months). Two patients had excision of the tumor with intent to cure. One patient with a solitary duodenal tumor was apparently cured but committed suicide 3 months postoperatively. The other patient had both obvious primary and occult metastatic tumors within the triangle and was eugastrinemic 9 months after excision. In all patients in whom tumor was found, it was locally excised, and no patient was subjected to radical pancreatic resection. There were no postoperative complications related to tumor removal. An aggressive approach towards curative tumor excision is now advocated for all gastrinoma patients who are suitable operative risks and have no evidence preoperatively of liver metastases or the multiple endocrine neoplasm-type I syndrome.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B E Stabile, D J Morrow, E Passaro. 1984. The gastrinoma triangle: operative implications.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(84)90029-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗