PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6694750

Sensitivity for vertical retinal image differences.

Abstract

The detection of horizontal disparities between the right and left retinal images is accepted as an important component in the visual perception of depth. It has occasionally been pointed out that a disparity will also occur in the vertical when a target is nearer to one eye than the other and could be used as a second component. Here it is shown that while it is possible to detect size differences between the retinal images in the vertical direction, the sensitivity is at least one order of magnitude less than the horizontal differences. It had been generally accepted that vertical disparities cannot be detected (literature summarized by Tschermak), but there are clear reports of the ability of subjects to respond to relative differences in the vertical magnification of the images of the two eyes, the so-called induced size effect. It manifests itself in the appearance of a visual scene as if there had been an opposite horizontal magnification and is, therefore, in the correct direction if it is to be utilized in asymmetrical convergence.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Westheimer. Sensitivity for vertical retinal image differences.. https://doi.org/10.1038/307632a0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Stereoscopic depth perception at high velocities.

The view of the world from different perspectives provided by the two eyes is used by the human visual system to compute the relative distances and solid shapes of objects. However, the traditional theory of binocular disparity takes little account of the fact that a moving target will stimulate many different sets of disparate points in the two eyes with a range of temporal delays. Here we show that stereoacuity for periodic grating is not degraded by velocities of up to 640 degrees s-1 provided that they do not move at a greater rate than 30 cycles s-1. The minimum detectable spatial phase difference between the eyes was equivalent to a spatial phase difference of about 5 degrees and an interocular temporal delay as small as 450 microseconds. We suggest that stereopsis for moving targets is accomplished by neurons having a spatial-temporal phase shift in their receptive fields between the eyes.

Depth Perception

On the accuracy of surface reconstruction from disparity interpolation.

Observers viewed flashed random-dot stereograms depicting a pair of long, narrow, curved ribbons of textured surface defined by a Gabor function in disparity. Observers judged the location of the peak of the depth profile of one ribbon relative to that of the other. In one ribbon, disparity changed smoothly while in the other disparity was periodically sampled. Up to a limiting sampling period, disparity interpolation produced accurate surface reconstruction, but beyond that performance deteriorated rapidly. This interpolation limit depended on surface orientation (vertical vs horizontal) and disparity sign, but not Gabor spatial frequency.

Depth Perception

Contour integration across depth.

In order to investigate the extent of the local connections subserving contour integration across depth, we measured performance for detecting the continuity of a path of Gabor elements distributed in depth and embedded in a three-dimensional field of random background elements. The results show that performance cannot be explained in terms of monocular performance and that contour information is not limited to single disparity planes. Path detection does indeed involve the integration of information across different, very disparate depth planes. The rules which emerge are in general similar to that already described in the two-dimensional case in as far as orientation and disparity are important. Unlike the two-dimensional case, three-dimensional integration operates over relatively large three-dimensional distances.

Depth Perception