PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6696595

Testing four diagnostic systems for schizophrenia.

Abstract

Four diagnostic systems for schizophrenia--New Haven, Feighner et al, Research Diagnostic Criteria, and DSM-III--were tested for reliability, comprehensiveness, concordance with established clinical use, specificity, and predictive validity. The sample consisted of 400 patients admitted to Chestnut Lodge, Rockville, Md, 330 of whom received long-term follow-up assessment by interview an average of 15 years after discharge. Diagnostic system criteria were applied retrospectively to abstracted medical records. Findings replicated recent studies on schizophrenia diagnosis and extended the generalizability of current nosologic systems to chronically ill patients. Results also indirectly supported the validity of applying these systems to medical records. This study demonstrated advantages and disadvantages of each system.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T H McGlashan. 1984. Testing four diagnostic systems for schizophrenia.. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790130037005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗