PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6699747

Retinal inhomogeneity. II. Spatial summation.

Abstract

Effects of spatial probability summation were measured with concentric cosine forming a set of contiguous annular zones having mean eccentricities of 0 degrees, 2.8 degrees, and 6.1 degrees. To detect these small effects reliably we measured contrast thresholds for all eccentricities at one spatial frequency in each experimental session by an interleaved-staircase method. Sharp edges were eliminated by truncating each zone at a zero crossing of the pattern, and fixation was controlled by stabilizing the retinal image. Under these conditions, each local region of the retina contributes to the sensitivity of larger regions by a standard, fourth-power summation rule, regardless of the number or contiguity of the component regions involved. This was experimentally confirmed with three nested zones for spatial frequencies from 0.5 to 5 cycles/degree. Together with the results of Part I of this series [D. H. Kelly, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 107 (1984)], the summation rule predicts that, over a large range, target size should have no effect on contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequencies, and this was also confirmed. Similar predictions were extrapolated to other contrast-sensitivity data for which empirical tests are not available.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D H Kelly. 1984. Retinal inhomogeneity. II. Spatial summation.. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.1.000114

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Localization of visual targets during optokinetic eye movements.

We investigated localization of brief visual targets during reflexive eye movements (optokinetic nystagmus). Subjects mislocalized these targets in the direction of the slow eye movement. This error decreased shortly before a saccade and temporarily increased afterwards. The pattern of mislocalization differs markedly from mislocalization during voluntary eye movements in the presence of visual references, but (spatially) resembles mislocalization during voluntary eye movements in darkness. Because neither reflexive eye movements nor voluntary eye movements in darkness have explicit (visual) goals, these data support the view that visual goals support perceptual stability as an important link between pre- and post-saccadic scenes.

Fixation, Ocular↗

Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading.

Saccadic eye movements and fixations are the behavioral means by which we visually sample text during reading. Human oculomotor control is governed by a complex neurophysiological system involving the brain stem, superior colliculus, and several cortical areas. A very widely held belief among researchers investigating primate vision is that the oculomotor system serves to orient the visual axes of both eyes to fixate the same target point in space. It is argued that such precise positioning of the eyes is necessary to place images on corresponding retinal locations, such that on each fixation a single, nondiplopic, visual representation is perceived. Vision works actively through a continual sampling process involving saccades and fixations. Here we report that during normal reading, the eyes do not always fixate the same letter within a word. We also demonstrate that saccadic targeting is yoked and based on a unified cyclopean percept of a whole word since it is unaffected if different word parts are delivered exclusively to each eye via a dichoptic presentation technique. These two findings together suggest that the visual signal from each eye is fused at a very early stage in the visual pathway, even when the fixation disparity is greater than one character (0.29 deg), and that saccade metrics for each eye are computed on the basis of that fused signal.

Fixation, Ocular↗