PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6713317

Should levodopa therapy be started early or late?

M D Muenter
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Clinical and experimental evidence suggests that, in Parkinson's disease, the late-occurring fluctuations in response to levodopa therapy are due to progression of the disease rather than to the therapy. Therefore, treatment with carbidopa/levodopa should be started early, because postponement does not provide patients with added benefits but deprives them of the most satisfying period of the therapeutic response.

Explore related subjects

Disability EvaluationHumansLevodopaParkinson DiseaseTime FactorsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M D Muenter. 1984. Should levodopa therapy be started early or late?. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0317167100046400

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Methods of evaluation of musician's dystonia: critique of measurement tools.

Musician's dystonia is associated with significant morbidity. To assess treatment options, accurate and precise measurements of disease severity are critical. We describe current methods of quantitatively measuring musician's dystonia of the upper extremity including subjective, objective, and automated methods. The degree to which these methods satisfy rigorous measurement criteria, including their reliability, validity, responsiveness to treatment, and practicality, is examined. We report that most of these methods have not been properly evaluated. Therefore, treatment trials based on these methods are difficult to interpret.

Disability Evaluation↗
PubMed2007

[Compensation for tinnitus in private accident insurance].

According to the provisions of private accident insurance, mental or psychic reactions are excluded from compensation. Until now, tinnitus was taken as fully psychic and therefore excluded. In two recently published judgments of the Federal Supreme Court in Germany the assessment of tinnitus in private accident insurance and particularly the exclusion clause section sign 2 Abs. 4 AUB 88 has been newly defined. According to this actual jurisdiction the compensation of tinnitus could be possible, when as physical underlying reason a proved harm in the inner ear or the auditory pathway (hearing loss), which can be traced back to the accident according to the rules of causality. This leads to the question how Tinnitus could be compensated without modification of the general terms and conditions of the private accident insurance. A compensating table is proposed, which recognizes the somatic (physical) part of tinnitus and is based on medical and scientific findings of the relation between hearing loss and tinnitus.

Disability Evaluation↗