PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6714619

[Biodynamics].

G Fischer
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The definition of a biological impulse's law is possible by the assumption of a biological axiom on a physical level with the Newton's axiom. Hence it follows a unique definition of velocity of growth and of acceleration of growth. With help of this significant quantities and of derived biological equations, hence it follows a closed biological system of quantities as a system of 4 main quantities which is possible to fasten with a lock to SI-System by power. The main quantity is biological force which appear as a vector with n dimensions. With consideration also of information it's possible to derive a biological unit of space which hold this vector. This space allows to derivate 2 more transformation relations analogous the Einstein's relation.

Explore related subjects

Biomechanical PhenomenaGrowthMathematicsEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Fischer. 1984. [Biodynamics].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6714619/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

The effect of bone quality on pedicle screw loading in axial instability. A synthetic model.

STUDY DESIGN: In this biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw bending moments, custom-fabricated vertebral analogues were loaded in axial compression to produce sagittal bending forces. Moments were measured directly from internally instrumented pedicle screws. OBJECTIVES: To establish the role of cancellous vertebral modulus on pedicle screw bending moments within the vertebral body and the vertebral pedicle. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screws are often used to manage axial instability of the spine. Clinical studies report a high incidence of screw bending failure, resulting in kyphosis and pain in some patients. Factors predisposing to bending failure are not well understood, although recent studies have shown that vertebral morphometry is important. METHODS: Axially canullated 7.0-mm pedicle screws, internally instrumented with paired strain gauges, were inserted into analogue vertebrae of uniform dimension. Cancellous modulus was varied from 25-100 MPa. Screws were rigidly mounted to a vertical testing frame, and axial loads were applied to the superior vertebral endplate, producing sagittal bending moments. Moments were recorded from gauges applied in the intrapedicular and intravertebral portions of the screw. Mean moments were compared using a Student's t test, with significance defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Cancellous modulus did not affect bending moments experienced in either the intrapedicular or intravertebral portions of the pedicle screws. Gauge accuracy was excellent, and with no gauge drift. CONCLUSIONS: Although small changes in pedicle morphometry can alter screw bending moments significantly, changes in cancellous modulus had no measurable impact on bending moments at these same loads. Bone density is likely to play a limited role in screw bending failure.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed1997

Wire fixation techniques of the cervical facets.

STUDY DESIGN: The changes in the biomechanical responses of the cervical spine altered by multilevel laminectomy to various facet wiring techniques were evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of various proposed techniques of cervical facet wiring used to offer rigid internal fixation after multilevel laminectomy. METHODS: Eight human cadaveric spine segments from C2-11 underwent combined flexion-compression loading. After testing intact and three-level laminectomy (C4-C6) preparations, two techniques of facet wiring fixation were evaluated in an identical manner. Force, displacement, and kinematics data at every level of the column were obtained. RESULTS: The mean stiffness of the intact column was significantly greater than the mean stiffness for laminectomized specimens. Individual facet wiring to the bone graft and through the spinous process below the laminectomy failed to restore stiffness to the laminectomized preparations, whereas the Luque rectangle method restored the stiffness to that found in the intact column. The increases in segmental and overall sagittal rotations resulting from multilevel laminectomy were not decreased significantly by the individual facet wiring technique, but the Luque rectangle technique demonstrated a reduction of sagittal rotations compared with laminectomy without fixation. CONCLUSIONS: The significant increases in total column flexibility and segmental flexural rotations after multilevel laminectomy were not corrected by techniques that depend on individual facet wires secured to an overlying strut, including wiring to the inferior intact segment. Crosslinking of the facet wire fixation above and below the laminectomized segments, as exemplified by the Luque rectangle technique, restored column stiffness and reduced segmental sagittal rotations.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed1997

Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical comparison of the pull-out strengths of lateral mass and pedicle screws in the human cervical spine. Measurements of pedicle dimensions and orientation were compiled. OBJECTIVES: To determine if transpedicular screws provide greater pull-out resistance than lateral mass screws and to investigate the anatomic feasibility of pedicle screw insertion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical pedicle screws have been reported in limited clinical and biomechanical studies, and some quantitative cervical pedicle anatomy has been reported. No direct biomechanical comparisons have been made between lateral mass and pedicle screws. METHODS: Fifty-six fresh disarticulated human vertebrae (C2-C7) were evaluated with computed tomography to determine morphometry and vertebral body bone density. Lateral mass and pedicle screws were randomized to left versus right. A 3.5-mm cortical screw was used for both techniques, unless a pedicle was narrower than 5.0 mm; then a 2.7-mm cortical screw was used instead. Pedicle wall violations were recorded. Screws were subjected to a uniaxial load to failure. Mean pedicle height, width, and angle with respect to the vertebral midline were tabulated for each level. RESULTS: The mean load-to-failure was 677 N for the cervical pedicle screws and 355 N for the lateral mass screws. No significant correlations for either screw type were found between pull-out strength and bone density, screw length, or vertebral level. Pedicle and lateral mass dimensions were highly variable and not predictive of pull-out strength. Seven (13%) minor pedicle wall violations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical pedicle screws demonstrated a significantly higher resistance to pull-out forces than did lateral mass screws. The variability in pedicle morphometry and orientation requires careful preoperative assessment to determine the suitability of pedicle screw insertion.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗