PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6731654

Picture-digit differences in processing clock times.

Abstract

Clock times displayed as digits and as clockfaces were used as stimuli in a series of experiments that tested the hypothesis that a common numerical code was used for processing clock times. Whether the task involved reading times or making comparative judgments of early/late or same/different, digits were always processed faster than clockfaces . The size of the format effect varied, however, with the processing demands of the task and with times at specific locations on the clockface . Also, automatic processing of times presented as clockfaces interfered with comparative judgments made with digits, but digital distractors were not found to interfere with judgments made to times as clockfaces . The findings are discussed within the context of picture-word differences in rate of access to articulatory and semantic codes. Conclusions are also made regarding the relative efficiency of displaying times digitally and in the form of clockfaces .

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Goolkasian. 1984. Picture-digit differences in processing clock times.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6731654/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space.

Although attention plays a significant role in vision, its spatial deployment and spread in the third dimension is not well understood. In visual search experiments we show that we cannot easily focus attention across isodepth loci unless they are part of a well-formed surface with locally coplanar elements. Yet we can easily spread our attention selectively across well-formed surfaces that span an extreme range of stereoscopic depths. In cueing experiments, we show that this spread of attention is, in part, obligatory. Attentional selectivity is reduced when targets and distractors are coplanar with or rest on a common receding stereoscopic plane. We conclude that attention cannot be efficiently allocated to arbitrary depths and extents in space but is linked to and spreads automatically across perceived surfaces.

Attention

Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction.

Positron emission tomography was used to measure changes in the regional cerebral blood flow of normal people while they searched visual displays for targets defined by color, by motion, or by a conjunction of color and motion. A region in the superior parietal cortex was activated only during the conjunction task, at a location that had previously been shown to be engaged by successive shifts of spatial attention. Correspondingly, the time needed to detect a conjunction target increased with the number of items in the display, which is consistent with the use of a mechanism that successively analyzes each item in the visual field.

Attention

Attention-generated apparent motion.

Motion perception mechanisms have recently been divided into three categories. First-order mechanisms primarily extract motion from moving objects or features that differ from the background in luminance. Second-order mechanism extract motion from moving properties, such as a moving area of flicker in which there is no difference in mean luminance between target and background. These first- and second-order motion mechanisms are primarily monocular. The existence of purely binocular, interocular and various other unusual kinds of apparent motion has promoted conjectures of a third-order mechanism, but there has been no clear suggestion as to the actual computations that such a mechanism might perform. Here we demonstrate 'alternating feature' stimuli that produce apparent motion only when the observer selectively attends to one of the embedded features in the display. The latent motion in the alternating feature stimuli is invisible to first- or second-order motion mechanisms, and the direction of apparent motion depends on the particular feature attended. These findings suggest the mechanism of third-order motion: the locations of the most significant features are registered in a salience map, and motion is computed directly from this map.

Attention