PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6743593

Social elements as mind.

Abstract

The assumption that 'mind' is the product of individual development and that cognition and emotion must be sited in individual people has dominated psychology until recently. The new conception of a 'social construction of mind' is grounded in the idea that an interpersonal conversation is the fundamental psychological reality, and that individual minds are appropriations from it. Such a personal mind is created by making private what is originally and primarily public. This idea strikes at the Cartesian basis of both behaviourist and non-behaviourist psychology, suggesting a more complex multidimensional set of polar oppositions for defining the problems of scientific psychology. For example, perhaps knowledge should be studied as a collective resource rather than as individual beliefs. There is evidence from anthropology that even that intimate form of cognitive organization we call the 'self' may have social origins in favoured grammatical models and so may be expected to differ from one linguistic culture to another.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Harré. 1984. Social elements as mind.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1984.tb01591.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Connectionism and the problem of systematicity (continued): why Smolensky's solution still doesn't work.

Paul Smolensky has recently announced that the problem of explaining the compositionality of concepts within a connectionist framework is solved in principle. Mental representations are vectors over the activity states of connectionist "units", but the vectors encode Classical trees, whose structural properties in turn "acausally" explain the facts of compositionality. This sounds suspiciously like the offer of a free lunch, and it turns out, upon examination, that there is nothing to it.

Cognition

Flexibility in the structure of human information processing.

The studies reported in this chapter argue for a flexible organization of higher mental processes, including perceptual and attentional systems in the visual modality and attentional systems related to action. There is electrophysiologic evidence that the visual perceptual system has a modularized structure, and that selection of perceived features is adjustable to sensory, conceptual, and utility constraints, both with respect to the hierarchy of selection cues and the transmission of information between perception and action. A distributed neural network subserves these functions and may therefore provide a source for plasticity and reorganization after brain damage by flexibility in the allocation of resources to various stages of stimulus analysis.

Cognition