PubMed · 6779948
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M B Levine. 1981-01-17. General practitioner as coroner.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.282.6259.196
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
CONTEXT: Medical legal investigations in the United States (primarily unnatural or suspected unnatural deaths) are carried out by medical examiner or coroner systems. Medical examiners-usually physicians and generally with training in pathology, medicolegal death investigation, and performance of forensic autopsies-generally have greater expertise in unnatural death investigations than do coroners. OBJECTIVE: To document the locations and implementation year for states and counties that have medical examiner systems that have replaced coroner systems or that are defined in statute and assist coroners in their investigations. DESIGN: Review of published information and national survey in 1997. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: County medical examiners and state medical examiners or their administrators. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The location of states and counties with medical examiner systems, the implementation year for each system, and the proportion of counties and population served by medical examiner systems. RESULTS: A total of 79 of 91 county medical examiners responded. A total of 36 states have at least 1 medical examiner system at the county, district, or state level in which there is no coroner involved in the death investigation process. Only 22 states have medical examiner death investigation systems in place and have no coroners in the state. Among 13 states in which some counties have coroner systems and some have medical examiner systems, medical examiner systems exist in 8% of counties and serve 43% of the population. Medical examiner systems that operate without coroner involvement serve about 48% of the population nationwide. Few state or county medical examiner systems have been implemented since 1990. CONCLUSIONS: In this century, medical examiner systems have gradually replaced coroner systems, but such change has slowed in recent years, with medical examiner systems now serving about 48% of the national population.
As a result of recent national events involving high-profile murder cases, medicolegal death investigation has begun to slowly receive the attention it deserves. Despite continued local problems of financial support and political control, the development of regionalized centers of forensic excellence is gradually improving the access of rural and suburban areas to high-quality forensic science services. Recent efforts to improve the quality of lay death investigators through hiring practices, training, and certification promises to eventually provide more professionally qualified and experienced death investigators.
Medical examiners in Nova Scotia recently attended their first-ever seminar concerning the skills, challenges and techniques their jobs require. It was welcomed by the physicians, most of whom are family physicians with little training in the investigation of sudden death.