PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6814789

Sodium measurements in multiple myeloma: two techniques compared.

Abstract

Sodium was determined by flame photometry and by direct potentiometry in 56 serum or plasma samples from 24 patients with multiple myeloma or macroglobulinemia. We observed differences between the two techniques as large as 17 mmol/L (12%). The flame-photometric values decreased relative to the direct-potentiometric values as protein increased or water content decreased. Moreover, the two sodium measurements could not be interconverted simply on the basis of correcting for protein or water content. There was significantly lower residual variance (p less than 0.005) when the direct-potentiometric sodium values were compared with the osmolality (corrected for the influence of glucose and urea nitrogen) than when the flame-photometric values for sodium were so compared. We conclude that direct potentiometric measurements of sodium in patients with multiple myeloma gives clinically relevant results but flame photometry does not. Clearly, the method by which sodium is measured in patients with multiple myeloma must be considered if results are to be interpreted correctly.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J H Ladenson, F S Apple, J J Aguanno, D D Koch. 1982. Sodium measurements in multiple myeloma: two techniques compared.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6814789/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Whole, Turret and step methods of rapid rescreening: is there any difference in performance?

We compared the performance of the Whole, Turret and Step techniques of 100% rapid rescreening (RR) in detection of false-negatives in cervical cytology. We tested RR performance with cytologists trained and among those without training. We revised 1,000 consecutive slides from women participating in an ongoing international screening trial. Two teams of experienced cytologists performed the RR techniques: one trained in RR procedures and the other not trained. The sensitivities in the trained group were Whole 46.6%, Turret 47.4% and Step 50.9%; and in the non-trained group were 38.6, 31.6 and 47.4%, respectively. The kappa coefficient showed a weak agreement between the two groups of cytologists and between the three RR techniques. The RR techniques are more valuable if used by trained cytologists. In the trained group, we did not observe significant differences between the RR techniques used, whereas in the non-trained group, the Step technique had the best sensitivity.

False Negative Reactions↗

Improved reliability of lymphoma diagnostics via PCR-based clonality testing: report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BHM4-CT98-3936.

The diagnosis of malignant lymphoma is a recognized difficult area in histopathology. Therefore, detection of clonality in a suspected lymphoproliferation is a valuable diagnostic criterion. We have developed primer sets for the detection of rearrangements in the B- and T-cell receptor genes as reliable tools for clonality assessment in lymphoproliferations suspected for lymphoma. In this issue of Leukemia, the participants of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action CT98-3936 report on the validation of the newly developed clonality assays in various disease entities. Clonality was detected in 99% of all B-cell malignancies and in 94% of all T-cell malignancies, whereas the great majority of reactive lesions showed polyclonality. The combined BIOMED-2 results are summarized in a guideline, which can now be implemented in routine lymphoma diagnostics. The use of this standardized approach in patients with a suspect lymphoproliferation will result in improved diagnosis of malignant lymphoma.

False Negative Reactions↗