PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6835810

Bright light affects human circadian rhythms.

Abstract

The relative effectiveness of external zeitgebers synchronizing circadian rhythms can be evaluated by measuring the size of the range of entrainment. The experimental approach to measure entrainment limits is the application of an artificial zeitgeber with slowly and steadily changing period. In human circadian rhythms, an absolute light-dark (LD) cycle with a light intensity during L of 1000 lux or less, results in an upper entrainment limit of 26.91 +/- 0.24 hours. The same limit is reached in constant illumination when only informations are given to the subjects. Consequently, the LD cycle is effective mainly with its behavioral component characterized by the request of the light-dark alternation to go to rest. In experiments with the same experimental protocol but higher intensity of illumination during L (approximately 4000 lux, i.e., exceeding the threshold beyond which melatonin excretion is suppressed in humans), human circadian rhythms can be synchronized within a much larger range; the upper entrainment limit is, with all overt rhythms measured, beyond 29 hours. This means that bright light has an effect on the human circadian system which is qualitatively different from that of dim light, and which is similar to the effect of light in most animal experiments. This finding has theoretical and practical implications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A Wever, J Polásek, C M Wildgruber. 1983. Bright light affects human circadian rhythms.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00584704

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Thermographic assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury in patients with dentofacial deformity.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the injury and recovery of the inferior alveolar nerve in orthognathic patients at 1 and 4 weeks after surgery using electronic thermography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty subjects with Class III dentofacial deformity were studied. All patients underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. To image the temperature of the face, 1 anteroposterior view and 1 lateral view were taken from both the right and left sides. Similar images were taken at 1 and 4 weeks after surgery. The control was the presurgical temperature of the 20 patients who showed unilateral or bilateral nerve damage after surgery. RESULTS: In the patients with unilateral nerve damage (n = 14), on the anteroposterior views, the temperatures of the mentum on the 2 sides differed by 0.64 degrees C at 1 week after surgery, and the difference decreased to 0.23 degrees C at 4 weeks after surgery. On the lateral images, the differences in temperature between the mentum areas were 0.10 degrees C at 1 week and 0.27 degrees C at 4 weeks after surgery. In the patients with bilateral nerve injury (n = 6), on the anteroposterior views, the temperatures of the mentum on the 2 sides differed by 0.20 degrees C at 1 week after surgery and 0.13 degrees C after 4 weeks. On the lateral views, the differences were 0.18 degrees C at 1 week and 0.34 degrees C at 4 weeks after surgery. Using the repeated measurement analysis method, the anteroposterior view showed statistically significant results in the patients with unilateral nerve damage. CONCLUSION: The infrared body temperature method is an objective method that can be applied as a supplemental diagnostic method for inferior alveolar nerve injury.

Body Temperature↗

The ingestible telemetric body core temperature sensor: a review of validity and exercise applications.

An ingestible telemetric temperature sensor for measuring body core temperature (Tc) was first described 45 years ago, although the method has only recently gained widespread use for exercise applications. This review aims to (1) use Bland and Altman's limits of agreement (LoA) method as a basis for quantitatively reviewing the agreement between intestinal sensor temperature (Tintestinal), oesophageal temperature (Toesophageal) and rectal temperature (Trectal) across numerous previously published validation studies; (2) review factors that may affect agreement; and (3) review the application of this technology in field-based exercise studies. The agreement between Tintestinal and Toesophageal is suggested to meet our delimitation for an acceptable level of agreement (ie, systematic bias <0.1 degrees C and 95% LoA within +/-0.4 degrees C). The agreement between Tintestinal and Trectal shows a significant systematic bias >0.1 degrees C, although the 95% LoA is acceptable. Tintestinal responds less rapidly than Toesophageal at the start or cessation of exercise or to a change in exercise intensity, but more rapidly than Trectal. When using this technology, care should be taken to ensure adequate control over sensor calibration and data correction, timing of ingestion and electromagnetic interference. The ingestible sensor has been applied successfully in numerous sport and occupational applications such as the continuous measurement of Tc in deep sea saturation divers, distance runners and soldiers undertaking sustained military training exercises. It is concluded that the ingestible telemetric temperature sensor represents a valid index of Tc and shows excellent utility for ambulatory field-based applications.

Body Temperature↗