PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6840117

Radioisotopic studies during exercise testing: how valuable?

Abstract

Myocardial imaging and exercise radionuclide angiography have proven useful in the detection of exercise-induced regional dysfunction. EF monitoring is, however, inadequate to detect deterioration of cardiac performances with complex changes in the ventricular loading conditions. Measurement of absolute volumes and especially of end-systolic volume by a count-derived technique will further enhance the value of this method when attenuation correction can be consistently performed. Non-invasive estimates of end-systolic indices could then be obtained. Concomitant evaluation of right ventricular ejection and function provides data on ventricular interdependence and allows quantification of regurgitant lesions and of their changes with exercise. Combined evaluation of these parameters will allow a better definition of the changes occurring in valvular heart disease. Radioisotopic studies also permit evaluation of stress-induced changes in pulmonary blood volume and in the pulmonary distribution of thallium. These parameters, although incompletely studied, could provide further evidence of transient LV dysfunction and deserve further study.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Rigo, M Chevigné. 1983. Radioisotopic studies during exercise testing: how valuable?. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj%2F4.suppl_a.115

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis: the Scandinavian multicentre, prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this report is the prospective, multicentre evaluation of clinical results and haemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis. METHODS: From April 2001 to June 2003, 166 patients (male:female 125:41; mean (SD) age 61.8 (11.8) years) received an aortic advantage valve prosthesis. Complete cumulative follow-up was 242.7 patient-years (maximum 3.2; mean 1.6 years). Postoperatively, patients underwent early (within 30 days) and 1 year transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: 30 day mortality was 2.4% (n = 4). Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from complications and linearised rates were as follows: 96.9 (1.6)% survival; 94.7 (1.3)% (2.06 patients/year) thrombo-embolism; 99.4 (0.6)% (0.4 patients/year) bleeding; 98.8 (0.9)% (0.8 patients/year) non-structural valve dysfunction; 98.8 (0.9)% (0.8 patients/year) reoperation. Valvular mean pressure gradients ranged from 16 (3) mm Hg for size 19 to 7 (2) mm Hg for size 27 and the corresponding effective orifice areas ranged from 1.2 (0.25) to 3.2 (0.66) cm(2). In all, left ventricular mass significantly decreased (p<0.001) and fractional shortening increased (p<0.001) from postoperative to 1 year echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS: Haemodynamic performance and early clinical results of Medtronic advantage in the aortic position were satisfactory and comparable with those of other bileaflet valves in current clinical use.

Aortic Valve Insufficiency↗

Aortic insufficiency due to a partial left-coronary aortic valve prolapse and the detection of two small interatrial jets after blunt thoracic trauma.

Aortic valve regurgitation due to blunt thoracic trauma is a rare complication. Autopsy studies have been shown that the aortic valve is the most often lacerated one among the heart valves. Actually, we describe a case of a 47 year old man with the signs of heart failure after a blunt thoracic trauma 2 months before caused by aortic insufficiency due to a partial left-coronary aortic valve prolapse. Furthermore, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography revealed two small jets between the left and the right atrium.

Aortic Valve Insufficiency↗