PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6842410

Using sentences to convey spatial information.

Abstract

Individuals listened to pairwise relationships (e.g., AB, BC, CD) and learned the underlying spatial ordering (e.g., ABCD). Previous work shows that the order in which information is presented strongly affects the success of learning and that these presentation order effects are different when the information occurs in sentences (e.g., "The B is to the left of the C") instead of pairs (e.g., "B-C"). By using a number of different presentation orders and both kinds of input, the present work reveals that these sentence-pair differences can be attributed to the presence of a stated relationship (e.g., the adjective "left") in the sentence and the corresponding facilitation of basic processes by linguistic structures. The role of language in the learning of spatial relationships is discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P W Foos. 1983. Using sentences to convey spatial information.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01067412

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Vicarious learning revisited: a contemporary behavior analytic interpretation.

Beginning in the 1960s, social learning theorists argued that behavioral learning principles could not account for behavior acquired through observation. Such a viewpoint is still widely held today. This rejection of behavioral principles in explaining vicarious learning was based on three phenomena: (1) imitation that occurred without direct reinforcement of the observer's behavior; (2) imitation that occurred after a long delay following modeling; and (3) a greater probability of imitation of the model's reinforced behavior than of the model's nonreinforced or punished behavior. These observations convinced social learning theorists that cognitive variables were required to explain behavior. Such a viewpoint has progressed aggressively, as evidenced by the change in name from social learning theory to social cognitive theory, and has been accompanied by the inclusion of information-processing theory. Many criticisms of operant theory, however, have ignored the full range of behavioral concepts and principles that have been derived to account for complex behavior. This paper will discuss some problems with the social learning theory explanation of vicarious learning and provide an interpretation of vicarious learning from a contemporary behavior analytic viewpoint.

Cognition

Cognitive assessment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group.

Recent theories of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) emphasize the importance of cognitive contents (beliefs and appraisals) and cognitive processes in the etiology and maintenance of OCD. In order to evaluate these theories and to assess the mechanisms of treatment-related change, it is necessary to develop measures of the relevant cognitive contents and processes. Several scales have been developed, although many are unpublished and there is a great deal of overlap among measures. The purpose of the present article is to describe the progress of an international group of investigators who have commenced a coordinated effort to develop a standardized set of cognitive measures. This article describes the theoretical bases and clinical importance of such an endeavor, and the proceedings of the working group meetings are summarized. Several methods of assessment are reviewed, including idiographic methods, information processing paradigms, and self-report measures. The working group is currently developing and evaluating self-report measures of appraisals about intrusions, and self-report measures of OC-related beliefs. Consensus ratings indicated that 6 belief domains are likely to be important in OCD. These are beliefs pertaining to: (1) inflated responsibility; (2) overimportance of thoughts; (3) excessive concern about the importance of controlling one's thoughts; (4) overestimation of threat; (5) intolerance of uncertainty; and (6) perfectionism.

Cognition