PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6847751

Placement or disposal?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F McKerracher. 1983-01-01. Placement or disposal?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6847751/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Irradiation for locally recurrent carcinoma of the prostate following radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcome of patients treated with irradiation (RT) for isolated, clinically apparent local tumor recurrence following prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate (CaP). METHODS: Between May 1979 and July 1992, 35 patients received external-beam RT as sole salvage therapy for post-prostatectomy locally recurrent CaP. Patient outcome was evaluated through retrospective medical record review with respect to clinical and prostate-specific antigen-based (that is, biochemical) control rates, as well as disease-free (clinical and biochemical) and overall survival estimates. Chronic RT-induced morbidity was also examined, and pre-RT disease characteristics were evaluated for their association with disease outcome. RESULTS: With median follow-up of 5.2 years (range 1.7 to 12.1) in survivors (30 patients), 19 patients (54%) had clinical (local, 1 patient [3%]; metastatic, 7 patients [20%]) or biochemical only (11 patients [31%]) relapse. The 8-year clinical relapse-free and any relapse-free (clinical or biochemical) rates were 80% and 56%, respectively, whereas the overall survival estimate was 97%. A chronic complication(s) of treatment was noted in 15 patients (43%) but spontaneously resolved in all but 6 (17%); persistent complications were mild and associated with rectal (grade 1 to 2, 14%) and lymphatic (3%) systems. The interval between prostatectomy and local tumor recurrence, the pre-RT prostate-specific antigen serum level, the pathologic stage, and tumor differentiation may be associated with disease outcome. CONCLUSIONS: External-beam RT resulted in excellent local tumor control without serious long-term morbidity in most patients. Although this study could not define an optimal management strategy (for example, symptomatic measures only, RT, or hormonal therapy), these results provided outcome measures, in relationship to pre-RT tumor-related factors, that may be valuable for clinical decision-making.

Follow-Up Studies

The role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in mature teratoma of the testis.

PURPOSE: Pure testicular teratoma is rare in adulthood with an incidence of 5%. Pure teratoma is considered less aggressive and less likely to metastasize than other nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Therefore, patients with mature teratoma have been considered candidates for surveillance protocols. We report our experience with 44 cases of primary pure testicular teratoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 44 patients (5.7%) with primary pure teratoma of the testis of the 772 treated for testicular germ cell tumors at our institutions. Archival tumor blocks were available for pathological reevaluation and serial sections were obtained in all cases. A total of 35 patients (79.5%) who presented with clinical low stage disease, including stage I in 26 (59.1%) and stage IIA/B in 9 (20.4%), underwent radical orchiectomy followed by retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Nine patients (20.5%) who presented with clinically advanced disease (stages IIC to IV) were treated with primary chemotherapy and secondary retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy of residual masses. RESULTS: The frequency of lymph node metastases was 19.2% in clinical stage I disease and 66% in stage IIA/B. Histopathological diagnosis of mature teratoma was confirmed in all cases. However, of 20 patients 16 (80%) had scars or calcifications in the adjacent parenchyma, indicating a burned out tumor, and 4 (20%) had microfocal embryonal carcinoma. None of the patients with clinical stage I disease had relapse during followup and the relapse rate in those with stage IIA/B disease was 33%. Median followup was 97 months (range 24 to 250). Overall 43% of patients with pure teratoma presented with metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the malignant potential of pure testicular mature teratoma. Based on our results metastases in testicular mature teratoma seem to result from metastasizing nongerm cell components undergoing early regression, as demonstrated by the high frequency of burned out tumors. We recommend that serial sections be taken of the orchiectomy specimen in all cases of pure mature teratoma to determine adequate management: retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in cases of associated scars, calcifications or microfocal malignant germ cell components and surveillance in cases of pure mature teratoma.

Follow-Up Studies