PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6848647

Integration of schematic faces and other complex objects in schizophrenia.

Abstract

Twenty-one acute schizophrenic patients and 26 neurotic patients sorted each of six sets of 15 objects into three groups. A set consisted either of schematic faces, nonsense objects, or histoforms, each composed of five independently varying features. For the faces and nonsense objects these features could be integrated into a whole, whereas for the histoforms they could not. The distribution of four of the features was such that a set could be divided into three groups. The fifth feature either remained constant and had no effect on sorting performance or it varied randomly and acted as a distractor. Performance was assessed from the variance in common between the grouping actually present in a set and the grouping produced by the subject. For the control patients faces were sorted much better than histoforms if no distractor was present. However, performance with faces was massively impaired by a distractor while performance with histoforms was not. For the schizophrenic patients faces were not sorted better than histoforms and the effect of distraction was similar for every type of material. The performance of the controls suggest that the gestalt quality of the faces dominated over their constituent details. This enabled more features to be handled at once, thus achieving better sorting with faces than histoforms. However, it also made it more difficult for subjects to ignore a distracting component in the faces. The performance of the schizophrenics suggests that for them the integrated gestalt of the face was not dominant over its components.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C D Frith, M Stevens, E C Johnstone, D G Owens, T J Crow. 1983. Integration of schematic faces and other complex objects in schizophrenia.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198301000-00007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗