PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6855915

Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination.

J R Bergen·B Julesz
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

When stimuli are available for just a brief period (approximately 100 ms) only restricted spatial information can be processed by the visual system. If the stimuli are presented very briefly, eye movements are not possible. The time during which the after-image of the stimulus is available for inspection is terminated by presentation of a masking pattern. We show here that in these conditions a small pattern is easily detected against a background made up of many others, only if this target pattern differs from the background patterns in certain local features. In this case the detectability of the target is almost independent of the number of background elements, suggesting that a parallel process is operating. Detection of patterns not differing from their backgrounds in such features requires focal attention which is a serial process. The aperture of this attention is scaled to minimize the number of shifts of attention required.

Explore related subjects

Discrimination, PsychologicalForm PerceptionHumansPattern Recognition, VisualProbabilityTime FactorsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J R Bergen, B Julesz. Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination.. https://doi.org/10.1038/303696a0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Continuity-based and discontinuity-based segmentation in transparent and spatially segregated global motion.

The mechanisms underlying the parsing of a spatial distribution of velocity vectors into two adjacent (spatially segregated) or overlapping (transparent) motion surfaces were examined using random dot kinematograms. Parsing might occur using either of two principles. Surfaces might be defined on the basis of similarity of motion vectors and then sharp perceptual boundaries drawn between different surfaces (continuity-based segmentation). Alternatively, detection of a high gradient of direction or speed separating the motion surfaces might drive the process (discontinuity-based segmentation). To establish which method is used, we examined the effect of blurring the motion direction gradient. In the case of a sharp direction gradient, each dot had one of two directions differing by 135 degrees. With a shallow gradient, most dots had one of two directions but the directions of the remainder spanned the range between one motion-defined surface and the other. In the spatial segregation case the gradient defined a central boundary separating two regions. In the transparent version the dots were randomly positioned. In both cases all dots moved with the same speed and existed for only two frames before being randomly replaced. The ability of observers to parse the motion distribution was measured in terms of their ability to discriminate the direction of one of the two surfaces. Performance was hardly affected by spreading the gradient over at least 25% of the dots (corresponding to a 1 degrees strip in the segregation case). We conclude that detection of sharp velocity gradients is not necessary for distinguishing different motion surfaces.

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed2000

Mechanisms of generalization in perceptual learning.

Learning in many visual perceptual tasks has been shown to be specific to practiced stimuli, while new stimuli have to be learned from scratch. Here we demonstrate generalization using a novel paradigm in motion discrimination where learning has been previously shown to be specific. We trained subjects to discriminate directions of moving dots, and verified the previous results that learning does not transfer from a trained direction to a new one. However, by tracking the subjects' performance across time in the new direction, we found that their speed of learning doubled. Therefore, we found generalization in a task previously considered too difficult to generalize. We also replicated, in a second experiment, transfer following training with 'easy' stimuli, when the difference between motion directions is enlarged. In a third experiment we found a new mode of generalization: after mastering the task with an easy stimulus, subjects who have practiced briefly to discriminate the easy stimulus in a new direction generalize to a difficult stimulus in that direction. This generalization depends on both the mastering and the brief practice. The specificity of perceptual learning and the dichotomy between learning of 'easy' versus 'difficult' tasks have been assumed to involve different learning processes at different cortical areas. Here we show how to interpret these results in terms of signal detection theory. With the assumption of limited computational capacity, we obtain the observed phenomena--direct transfer and acceleration of learning--for increasing levels of task difficulty. Human perceptual learning and generalization, therefore, concur with a generic discrimination system.

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed1999

The extrinsic/intrinsic classification of two-dimensional motion signals with barber-pole stimuli.

The perceived direction of different barber-pole stimuli was assessed by adjusting an arrow on the screen. The terminator ratio (TR: number of terminators moving along the long side divided by the number of terminators moving along the small side) was either one or three. In this latter case, the aperture orientation was either vertical or horizontal. The grating was either in the same plane as the aperture (intrinsic condition) or behind the aperture--the frame containing the aperture had a crossed disparity relative to the grating--(extrinsic condition). A nested design with 120 observers was used for the whole study. Five grating orientations were intermingled within any session. With a terminator ratio of three, the results depend strongly on the aperture's orientation. When the rectangular aperture is horizontal, the perceived direction of an intrinsic grating is horizontal (the typical barber-pole illusion), whereas it is only slightly biased towards orthogonal one-dimensional (1D) motion signals (Vp) in the extrinsic condition. When the aperture is vertical, the perceived direction in the intrinsic condition is largely biased toward Vp, and on average it is close to Vp in the extrinsic condition. In this latter case, however, analysing the distributions of responses shows that many responses do not lie around Vp but are clustered near vertical or horizontal. This motion capture depends on the grating's orientation. With a terminator ratio of one, motion capture is present in both the extrinsic and intrinsic conditions. Moreover, a global bias toward horizontal is observed: this horizontal bias is much larger in the extrinsic condition. Altogether, these results suggest that binocular disparity alone is a weak determinant of the extrinsic/intrinsic classification of two-dimensional (2D) motion signals compared to the occlusion cues provided by unpaired regions in binocular images. Second, truly extrinsic 2D motion signals are not suppressed but rather actively compete against each other to capture the 1D motion signals. This results in a perceptual multistability which is much stronger with extrinsic signals. Finally, given the inherent multistability of barber-pole stimuli, high-level factors can alter the strength of this competition and prime any of the 2D motion signals.

Discrimination, Psychological↗