PubMed · 6864278
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G Debrun. 1983. Balloon embolus.. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1983.59.1.0182a
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To determine the natural history and durability of bilateral carotid endarterectomy (CEA), we studied 27 patients who participated in a randomized, prospective, consecutive entry trial comparing vein patch with primary CEA closure. This cohort represented 20% of the 136 patients who took part in the 4-year study. Bilateral CEAs were planned at the time of the original admission in 13 (48%), whereas 14 (52%) developed late indications for contralateral CEA a mean of 27 +/- 7 months after the initial procedure. Among the 27 patients, 15 underwent alternating methods of CEA closure. During a mean follow-up of 64 +/- 7 months, five patients had six recurrences (four unilateral, one bilateral). The type of closure did not affect the recurrence rate. All recurrences were asymptomatic and measured < 50% diameter loss by duplex criteria. There were no strokes. Two other patients had late transient ischemic attacks, but neither of them had arteriographic evidence of recurrent carotid disease. No patient underwent reoperative CEA. These data demonstrate that bilateral CEA is durable. Late recurrences are rare and clinically insignificant. The higher rate of unilateral recurrence suggests that local factors play a more important role than systemic factors in the etiology of recurrent disease.
Progress in therapeutic decision-making for patients with carotid artery disease has come from evaluations made by several major randomized clinical trials. For patients who are symptomatic and have arteriographically proven stenoses of 70% or more, endarterectomy is clearly established as the treatment of choice. Symptomatic patients with stenoses of less than 70% remain the subject of ongoing study. Asymptomatic patients are at low risk of stroke save for those with the highest (80% to 90%) degrees of stenosis, and even for these subjects the annual stroke rate is close to the operative risk. Four trials have been reported but the practicing physician is still without clear guidelines. The appropriateness of endarterectomy remains unsettled for any group of patients with narrowing of the carotid artery in the absence of symptoms. The decision to apply endarterectomy to symptomatic and to asymptomatic patients must attend to not only the prognostic importance of the degree of stenosis, but also to the vascular risk profile of the individual patient.