PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6868384

Contrast sensitivity: psychophysical and evoked potential methods compared.

M W Cannon
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Evoked Potentials, VisualEyeglassesFlicker FusionHumansPattern Recognition, VisualPsychophysicsSensory ThresholdsVisual AcuityVisual PerceptionComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M W Cannon. 1983. Contrast sensitivity: psychophysical and evoked potential methods compared.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(83)90045-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the occipital pole can suppress visual perception. Since its first description in 1989 by Amassian et al., this technique has widely been used to investigate visual processing at the cortical level. This article presents a review of experiments masking visual stimuli by TMS. The psychophysical characterization of TMS masking, the dependence on stimulus onset asynchrony between visual stimulus and TMS pulse, and the topography of masking within the visual field are considered. The relation between visual masking and the generation of phosphenes is discussed as well as the underlying physiological mechanisms.

Evoked Potentials, Visual↗