PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6868961

Fetal activity acceleration during early labor.

Abstract

Altogether 59 women (53 normal and 6 high-risk pregnancies) underwent a fetal activity acceleration determination (FAD) during the first stage of labor. 52 FAD were considered reactive, while 5 were non-reactive and 2 technically inadequate. Four of the 5 fetuses with a non-reactive FAD showed signs of fetal compromise during labor and 1 died intra-uterinely. There were significantly more normal births and non-compromised fetuses in the FAD reactive group than in the non-reactive (p less than 0.002, chi 2-test), while there were significantly more acute cesarean sections in the non-reactive group (p less than 0.001, chi 2-test). Of the 12 vacuum extractions (all in the FAD reactive group) 4 were performed because of prolonged 2nd stage and 8 because of suspected because of prolonged 2nd stage and 8 because of suspected intra-uterine asphyxia, but all infants did well after delivery, and the umbilical arterial pH was in all cases above 7.15. It is concluded that when a FAD test is reactive in the first stage of labor, one can expect a positive outcome of the birth, whereas a non-reactive test arouses suspicion of fetal compromise and implies that one must carefully monitor the progress of the birth so that the fetus can be delivered promptly if any sign of late decelerations should appear. A reactive FAD is, on the other hand, rather reassuring for the fetal state.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H C Nyholm, T Hansen, S Neldam. 1983. Fetal activity acceleration during early labor.. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016348309155776

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of teamwork training on the occurrence of adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery. METHODS: A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted at seven intervention and eight control hospitals. The intervention was a standardized teamwork training curriculum based on crew resource management that emphasized communication and team structure. The primary outcome was the proportion of deliveries at 20 weeks or more of gestation in which one or more adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes or both occurred (Adverse Outcome Index). Additional outcomes included 11 clinical process measures. RESULTS: A total of 1,307 personnel were trained and 28,536 deliveries analyzed. At baseline, there were no differences in demographic or delivery characteristics between the groups. The mean Adverse Outcome Index prevalence was similar in the control and intervention groups, both at baseline and after implementation of teamwork training (9.4% versus 9.0% and 7.2% versus 8.3%, respectively). The intracluster correlation coefficient was 0.015, with a resultant wide confidence interval for the difference in mean Adverse Outcome Index between groups (-5.6% to 3.2%). One process measure, the time from the decision to perform an immediate cesarean delivery to the incision, differed significantly after team training (33.3 minutes versus 21.2 minutes, P=.03). CONCLUSION: Training, as was conducted and implemented, did not transfer to a detectable impact in this study. The Adverse Outcome Index could be an important tool for comparing obstetric outcomes within and between institutions to help guide quality improvement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: (www.ClinicalTrials.gov), NCT00381056 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Delivery, Obstetric↗