PubMed · 6886621
Proofreading errors in good and poor readers.
Abstract
Seven-year-old children classified as good and poor readers carried out a proofreading task on two passages varying in level of difficulty. Misspellings were introduced by transposing two adjacent letters in the work "the," other three-letter words, and longer words. While both groups of readers were able to identify the correct spelling of the misspelled words on a spelling test, poor readers made significantly more proofreading errors. Word length had a significant effect on performance, indicating that sensitivity to word configuration is important for successful proofreading. The pattern of proofreading errors did not reflect underlying differences which might relate to strategies used by the two groups in normal reading. The results are compared with those from other proofreading and letter detection experiments in order to highlight methodological implications when such tasks are used to verify hypotheses concerned with normal reading strategies.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S Supramaniam. 1983. Proofreading errors in good and poor readers.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(83)90058-9
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.