PubMed · 6908436
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L Fowler. 1981. Mechanical ventilation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6908436/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Dyspnea is a common symptom and, in most cases, can be effectively managed in the office by the family physician. The differential diagnosis is composed of four general categories: cardiac, pulmonary, mixed cardiac or pulmonary, and noncardiac or nonpulmonary. Most cases of dyspnea are due to cardiac or pulmonary disease, which is readily identified with a careful history and physical examination. Chest radiographs, electrocardiograph and screening spirometry are easily performed diagnostic tests that can provide valuable information. In selected cases where the test results are inconclusive or require clarification, complete pulmonary function testing, arterial blood gas measurement, echocardiography and standard exercise treadmill testing or complete cardiopulmonary exercise testing may be useful. A consultation with a pulmonologist or cardiologist may be helpful to guide the selection and interpretation of second-line testing.
OBJECTIVE: Whether a chest radiograph should be performed routinely in all infants after extubation, or selectively only in those with clinical deterioration, is a controversy in neonatal unit practice. This study tested the hypothesis that most cases of post-extubation radiological deterioration in the lungs could be detected by clinical assessment. METHODS: A chest radiograph was performed at 8 h post-extubation in 100 episodes of extubation in 85 newborn infants ventilated for a variety of lung diseases. Each infant was assessed at the same time by a neonatologist blinded to the radiological findings, to determine whether a chest radiograph would have been requested based on clinical judgement. The infants were continuously monitored for their respiratory and oxygenation status before and after extubation. RESULTS: Compared to the pre-extubation chest radiographs, 23 of the 100 post-extubation chest radiographs showed either deterioration of the pre-existing lung pathologies or appearance of significant new pathologies. The clinicians' assessment failed to detect most of the deterioration, with a sensitivity of only 21.7%. Systematic analysis of the infants' clinical parameters showed that the development of significant intercostal/subcostal retraction, and an increase in inspired oxygen concentration by > or = 7% after extubation, were the best predictors of post-extubation radiological deterioration (sensitivity 82.6%, specificity 62.3%, positive predictive value 39.6%, and negative predictive value 92.3%). Serial blood gas in contrast had little predictive value. CONCLUSION: We conclude that most cases of radiological deterioration of the lungs after extubation are clinically predictable, provided the correct clinical criteria are used.
To test whether orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) patients with low pulmonary diffusion capacity have a greater limitation to exercise than OHT patients with normal pulmonary diffusion capacity, we investigated cardiorespiratory responses and blood gases in two groups of OHT patients, one with low (LdG) and the other with normal pulmonary diffusion capacity (NdG), during a graded exercise test. The results showed 1) significantly reduced peak power (P < 0.05), peak oxygen uptake (VO2, P < 0.001), peak oxygen pulse (VO2/heart rate, P < 0.01), peak minute ventilation (VE, P < 0.05), and delta PaO2 (peak PaO2 - rest PaO2, P < 0.05) in LdG versus NdG; 2) a nonsignificant decrease in peak heart rate in LdG (P < 0.13, P = 24%); and 3) significant increases in peak respiratory equivalent for oxygen (VE/VO2, P < 0.05) and delta P(A-a)O2 (peak P(A-a)O2 - resting P(A-a)O2, P < 0.05) in LdG versus NdG. No significant difference was found for PaO2 and PaCO2 at rest or at peak exercise between the groups. A strong correlation was found between pulmonary diffusion capacity (TLCO/VA) and peak VO2 (r = 0.81, P < 0.01); that is, TLCO/VA explains 66% of the variance in peak VO2. We conclude that OHT patients with decreased pulmonary diffusion capacity have a lower exercise tolerance than patients with normal pulmonary diffusion capacity. However, because of the lack of exercise-induced hypoxemia, diffusion abnormalities are not the main limiting factor for exercise tolerance in the low diffusion group.