PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6918923

A Patient Satisfaction Instrument: precision by replication.

Abstract

The Patient Satisfaction Instrument (PSI) was developed over a series of five clinical and administrative studies during a period of eight years, with a total of 600 patients, primarily medical-surgical inpatients and outpatients. The process illustrates measurement precision by replication. The PSI is a Likert-type summated rating scale with three dimensions of patient satisfaction: technical-professional care, trust, patient education. It was adapted for use with inpatients from Risser's out-patient instrument. Internal consistency estimates appear satisfactory and stable across the various studies; for example, alpha coefficients for the Technical-Professional subscale average .79, Education coefficients average .78, and Trust coefficients average .88. Interitem, item-subscale, and interscale correlations corroborate the alphas. Construct validity estimates were made via convergent/discriminant technique, discriminance, and predictive modeling. Empirical correlations moderately substantiated the multiple, convergent/discriminant predictions. Discriminance was strongly documented for all but the Education subscale, which had modest support. Predictive modeling produced moderate to strong validity estimates. Overall, the PSI has acceptable levels of validity and reliability with refinements indicated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A S Hinshaw, J R Atwood. A Patient Satisfaction Instrument: precision by replication.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6918923/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗