PubMed · 6921042
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P Simon, J W Moncrief, K Pyle. 1982. CAPD: are three exchanges per day adequate?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6921042/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with end stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis were correlated in dialysis adequacy within facilities. This was a retrospective analysis of dialysis adequacy based on urea reduction ratio (URR) values from 6969 patients dialyzed at 154 facilities. The within-center correlation was quantified using the between-center variation and the parameter p that was derived using ANOVA tables and mixed effects models. The variation in center means for URR was wider than expected for independent observations (52.9-76.1 versus 60.7-73.8, respectively). Furthermore, there was a significant within-center correlation in URR values across all facilities (p = 0.136, P<0.0001), which persisted after adjusting for patient specific covariates, facility characteristics, and state. In conclusion, there was a substantial within-center correlation in dialysis adequacy that reflected important center effects on the outcome of ESRD patients.
This study was designed to assess: (1) whether furosemide modifies the incidence of failure to close a symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in response to indomethacin in premature infants, (2) whether furosemide decreases renal and hydromineral side effects of indomethacin, and (3) whether the effects of furosemide on renal function depend on initial extracellular volume [assessed by blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine ratio]. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published controlled trials assessing either ductal closure or renal function after randomized allocation to treatment with indomethacin and furosemide versus indomethacin alone. All of the three studies meeting entry criteria were small and had methodological limitations. The number of patients was too small to rule out a 10% risk increase in failure of ductal closure. After the first dose of indomethacin, patients receiving furosemide had higher urine output, fractional excretion of sodium, and osmolar clearance than controls. Among patients with initial BUN/creatinine ratio <20, those on furosemide had a higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR) than controls. Among patients with initial BUN/creatinine of 20-30, those on furosemide had a lower GFR than controls. Thus, dehydration appears to be a contraindication for furosemide administration in premature infants treated with indomethacin for symptomatic PDA. The risk-benefit ratio of administering furosemide in well-hydrated patients treated with indomethacin for symptomatic PDA could only be assessed by a large randomized clinical trial.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether an observed difference in hemodialysis adequacy between states in Network 5 was due to variations in patient characteristics and to what extent dialysis center effects played a role in the observed disparity between states. This was a retrospective observational study of 6,969 patients dialyzed at centers in Maryland and Virginia. There were 3,919 patients on hemodialysis at 89 facilities in Virginia and 3,050 subjects dialyzed at 65 centers in Maryland. The mean urea reduction ratio (URR) was higher in Virginia compared with Maryland (68.2 +/- 0.1% v 66.0 +/- 0.2%, P < 0.0001, respectively), and there continued to be a mean difference in URR of 1.8% between VA and MD (P < 0.0001) after adjusting for several covariates. The differences in URR between states varied depending on facility proprietary status, size as measured by number of stations, and relationship to hospital (free-standing or hospital-based). Furthermore, the center where a patient dialyzed, when treated as a fixed effect, accounted for 15% of the variance in URR. The mean difference of 1.8% in URR between states persisted in a mixed-effects model that included all covariates along with adjusting for dialysis centers as a random effect. The disparity in dialysis adequacy between states in Network 5 could not be accounted for by demographic characteristics, case mix factors, or a large center effect observed in the region. Therefore, we conclude that underlying national reports on dialysis adequacy are heterogeneous results related to differences across regions such as states within a given Network. This difference between states is not explained by the strong center effect found on adequacy in this population of hemodialysis patients.