PubMed · 6944390
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S Katsuyama. 1981. [Resins polymerized under visible light].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6944390/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
AIM: This work investigates the hardness and buckling force of penile prostheses to further understand the rigidity of penile prostheses before and after implantation. METHODS: Evaluated herein are four prosthetic samples (three inflatable, one semi-rigid), five real prostheses (one inflatable, four semi-rigid), and one prosthesis after implantation. The hardness is measured with a Shore Durimeter by pressing the tester's indentor to the surface of the specimen. A volunteer with inflatable prosthesis implantation is evaluated with respect to penile hardness versus various numbers of pumping. The buckling force of the prosthesis is also determined by a push-pull gauge and a specially designed sampling table. RESULTS: Results in this study demonstrate that although the inflatable prosthesis could only be pumped to a certain amount of hardness, hardness and buckling force correlate well with each other. After reaching the hardness limit, prostheses can even be pumped a further few times. However, continuous pumping only puts more tension on the prosthetic material without increasing hardness and could induce mechanical failure of the prosthesis. Results also indicate that the buckling force decreases with increasing length of the semirigid prostheses, and increases when the prosthesis has a larger diameter. CONCLUSION: This mechanical measurement of rigidity in penile prostheses could provide more information to clinicians about the penile prosthesis before surgical implantation, and to patients about prosthesis usage after implantation.
BACKGROUND: Aim of the study is to compare microstructure of Titanium joints soldered with Laser and Infrared methods by performing SEM analysis, metallography and microhardness evaluation. METHODS: Wax specimens were separated in the middle area corresponding to the joint region, machined and then soldered. 40 Titanium samples were fused and divided in 2 groups of 20 samples each. First group was soldered by laser welding, second one by infrared brazing. SEM analysis and standard metallography were carried out at joined areas and unsoldered surfaces. Microhardness test was performed on longitudinally sectioned samples with 150 g load for 15 second up to 7 mm distance from the joined area. RESULTS: SEM photomicrographs revealed for group 1 a homogeneous metal-joint interface, without microporosities; for group 2 exhibited a distinct demarcation of metal joint interface. Metallography evaluation showed for laser joined samples only the presence of Titanium; infrared joined samples showed in soldered regions also Ni and Cu. Microhardness values detected at the joined surfaces seem to be higher for both considered groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laser joining method with exclusive presence of Titanium seems to be ideal for monometallism; both techniques exhibited microstructural changes in the heated surface layer.
The thrust of the present work was the development of a new modification to the ASTM E813-89 method for determining the J-integral fracture toughness, JIc, of ductile polymers. The advantages and limitations of the modification, vis a vis the ASTM E813-89 and the hysteresis methods, are presented. The modification was then applied to investigate the effect of sterilization method on the JIc of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) specimens that were subsequently aged (heated, in a cylindrical pressure vessel, in oxygen gas at 507 kPa and 70 degrees C for 14 d). Relative to the unsterilized material, it was found that gamma-irradiating the polymer leads to a significant drop in its JIc, while sterilization using either ethylene oxide or gas plasma produced no effect on its JIc. The clinical implications of the present results for the in vivo performance of UHMWPE counterfaces, and, hence, hip and knee arthroplasties, are fully discussed.