PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6957435

A derived basic ability criterion for predicting dental students' performance.

Abstract

This study represents an attempt to develop a valid criterion for predicting students' performance while in dental school. Dental students' overall grade point averages were partitioned into component measures of relevant basic ability clusters in terms of factor scores. The derived indices were used as criterion variables in simple and multiple correlation and regression analyses, with Dental Admission Test (DAT) and predental college scores as predictors. Results showed that basic science abilities were associated with the preprofessional academic predictors, and manual skills with the DAT Perceptual Motor Ability Test (PMAT) scores. None of the presently available preprofessional predictors, taken singly or together, were correlated sufficiently with the factor-associated dental science performance or the nonfactor-associated dental clinical performance for effective prediction. Findings that the development of dental and clinical proficiency at the predoctoral level depends neither on available predictors nor on preprofessional background in the basic sciences have implications for traditional admission policies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R H Potter, R E McDonald, G D Sagraves. 1982. A derived basic ability criterion for predicting dental students' performance.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6957435/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Medical heuristics: the silent adjudicators of clinical practice.

Robust scientific conclusions are too sparse to inform fully most of the choices that physicians must make about tests and treatments. Instead, ad hoc rules of thumb, or "heuristics," must guide them, and many of these are problematic. Physicians extrapolate from the small samples studied by clinical trials to general populations, but they do so inconsistently. Many physicians live by rules that dictate "not treating the numbers," correcting abnormalities slowly, achieving diagnostic certainty, and operating now to avoid "greater" risk in the future. Yet in each case, historical trends or statistical realities suggest either doing the opposite or investing in more discriminating heuristics. The heuristics of medicine should be discussed, criticized, refined, and then taught. More uniform use of explicit and better heuristics could lead to less practice variation and more efficient medical care.

Clinical Competence