PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6961886

Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis.

J L Hopper·J D Mathews
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Lange, Westlake & Spence (1976) used the assumption of multivariate normality to apply a likelihood method to the analysis of quantitative traits measured over pedigrees. We now introduce a test of the assumption of multivariate normality and methods for the detection of outlying families and outlying individuals. We also introduce a method for the estimation of effects of measured genetic markers as variance components, a flexible parameterization to estimate effects of shared family environment, and a method to allow for the ascertainment of pedigrees through probands. These innovations have been applied using numerical methods for maximization of the likelihood. Simulation studies and available theory suggest that the likelihood ratio criterion used in significance testing follows the expected asymptotic distribution with sample sizes encountered in typical applications.

Explore related subjects

FamilyGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationHumansModels, GeneticPedigreeJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Hopper, J D Mathews. 1982. Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1982.tb01588.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Genetic association tests for family data with missing parental genotypes: a comparison.

We consider three tests for genetic association in data from nuclear families (the Family-Based Association Test (FBAT) test proposed by Rabinowitz and Laird ([2000] Hum. Hered. 50:211-223), a second test proposed by Rabinowitz ([2002] J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97:742-758), and the Family Genotype Analysis Program (FGAP) nonfounder or partial score test proposed by Clayton ([1999] Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65:1170-1177) and Whittemore and Tu ([2000] Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66:1329-1340)). We show that each test statistic arises from the efficient score of the family data as the solution to a set of constraints on its null expectation. Moreover, the FBAT and Rabinowitz tests (but not the FGAP test) are locally the most powerful among all tests satisfying their constraints. We used simulations to examine how the three tests perform in situations when their assumptions are violated and the number of families is not huge. We found that the FBAT test tended to have less power than the other two tests, particularly when applied to families in whom all offspring were affected. The Rabinowitz and FGAP tests performed similarly, although the latter tended to extract more information from families containing one typed parent. While none of the tests showed good power to detect rare, recessively acting genes, the Rabinowitz test with a sample variance estimate performed particularly poorly in this case. However, the Rabinowitz test with a model-based variance had power comparable to that of the FGAP test, and more accurate type I error rates. We conclude that for the situations we considered, the Rabinowitz test with model-based variance has good power without forfeiting robustness against misspecification of parental genotype probabilities. However, its utility is limited by the lack of a simple algorithm to apply it to families with varying structures and phenotypes.

Family↗
PubMed2003

Familiality in simple and complex disease.

Establishing the existence of a genetic contribution to disease is the first step in identifying the underlying gene defect(s). This can present a considerable challenge, particularly in diseases where the genetic contribution is complex in nature. Clinically well-characterized cohorts and large inter-institutional collaborations will be required to identify genes involved in complex disease.

Family↗