PubMed · 6962380
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M McKeage, A H Smith, N Pearce. 1982-12-08. Mini-Wright Peak Flow Meter.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6962380/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Volume delivery by positive pressure inflation was determined in 20 premature infants and 10 infants born at term on days 1 and 2. The spontaneous tidal volume, respiratory rate and inspiratory to expiratory (I:E) ratio were measured daily in the first week of life in an additional group of 20 infants born prematurely. Measurements were made using a pneumotachograph only when the infants were stable and had acceptable blood gases for at least 2 h. There was variability between individuals but the median delivered volume by positive pressure ventilation ranged between 4.9 and 6.1 ml/kg on days 1 and 2 and within the groups of different maturity. There was no significant difference in the results of infants born prematurely or at term or when studied on days 1 or 2. The median spontaneous tidal volume during the first week of life varied between 5.4 and 6.7 ml/kg; respiratory rate between 72 and 80 breaths/min and I:E ratio from 0.67 to 0.77. Postnatal age had no significant effect on the results. These results suggest volume delivery by positive pressure inflation during a stable period of ventilation is similar to the spontaneous tidal volume.
We have developed a new technique that allows assessment of infant lung function over an extended volume range. The lungs are rapidly inflated to a predetermined inflation pressure (PP) using a modified diaphragm pump. Forced expiratory flow-volume (FEFV) curves are then generated from raised lung volumes using an inflatable plastic jacket. We studied 26 normal infants with a median age of 14 mo (range, 3 to 23 mo). FEFV curves were obtained in each infant from end-tidal inspiration and from lung volumes set by a range of PP (15 to 20 cm H2O). Mean (SE) volume above FRC was 107 ml (9 ml), and mean forced expiratory time was 0.73 s (0.05 s) at end-tidal inspiration. Both measurements increased progressively with increases in PP to 251 ml (13 ml) and 1.04 s (0.06 s), respectively, at 20 cm H2O PP (p < 0.0001). Mean intrasubject coefficient of variation was 15.5% (95% confidence interval, 12 to 19%) for maximal flow at FRC, but it was less than 6% (95% CI, 4 to 8%) for forced expiratory volume-time (FEVt) measurements at all levels of PP. Twenty-seven recurrently wheezy infants with a median age of 13 mo (range, 6 to 18 mo) were subsequently studied using a PP of 17.5 cm H2O. Wheezy infants had a lower VmaxFRC [mean (1.39 ml/s/cm) and 95% CI (1.15 to 1.63 ml/s/cm)] than did normal infants (1.78 ml/s/cm; CI, 1.51 to 2.05) (p < 0.05). FEV1 measurements were all lower in wheezy infants than in normals infants: mean FEV0.5, 1.86 ml/cm (CI, 1.73 to 1.98) and 2.31 ml/cm (CI, 2.15 to 2.48), respectively (p < 0.0001); FEV0.75, 2.20 ml/cm (CI, 2.07 to 2.32) and 2.72 ml/cm (CI, 2.52 to 2.91), respectively (p < 0.0001); FEV1.0, 2.42 ml/cm (CI, 2.26 to 2.58) and 2.84 ml/cm (CI, 2.63 to 3.06), respectively (p < 0.005). The Ci values of each FEVt measurement did not overlap between the wheezy and normal groups; however, the CI values of VmaxFRC overlapped markedly. In addition, FEVt parameters showed greater sensitivity in detecting reduced lung function (71 to 89%) than did VmaxFRC parameters (56%). We conclude that (1) FEVt measurements derived from a lung volume set by a standardized pressure are more reproducible than flow measurements in the tidal volume range; (2) FEVt measurements are significantly lower in wheezy infants than in normal infants, show less overlap than flow measurements in the tidal volume range, and therefore are better able to separate the two populations.
The results of functional tests and the values of flow-volume and spirometric parameters were reevaluated in 1174 randomly selected patients with no evidence of heart disease. There were 533 patients with normal ventilation and 327 patients with no restrictive disorders. In the latter group 11% of the patients had normal FEV1 and lowered FEF50 and FEF75 values. In those patients obstructive changes would not have been found if expiratory flow rates had not been taken into account as one of the criteria for evaluating airway obstruction. In further 13% of the patients a mild airway obstruction would have been found had only FEV1 been evaluated without taking account of expiratory flow rates. It is concluded that expiratory flow rates along with anamnestic data and clinical status are important indicators of obstructive changes of ventilation, especially as they serve to identify functional disorders while these are still reversible and therapy can be useful.