Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is an effective technique for providing emergent circulatory assistance, and may represent a life-saving option in patients who might not initially be considered a candidate for other forms of circulatory support (extracorporeal or implantable left ventricular assist device [LVAD]). In the setting of cardiac arrest, ECLS represents the only viable method of initiating circulatory support. However, ECLS has a number of disadvantages that include high complication rates (eg, stroke, bleeding) and a limited duration of potential support, which have prevented its widespread acceptance, particularly in the adult population. With the increased successful application of long-term implantable LVADs as a bridge to transplant, the major limitation of ECLS could be overcome by bridging patients to a long-term implantable LVAD ("bridge to bridge"), thereby reducing the reluctance to utilize ECLS when indicated. After acquisition of the HeartMate LVAD (Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc, Woburn, MA) we investigated the use of ECLS as a bridge to an implantable LVAD and subsequent transplantation in selected high-risk patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: From Oct 1, 1996 to Sept 30, 2000, 33 adult patients presenting with cardiac arrest or severe hemodynamic instability were placed on ECLS for the bridge to bridge indication. Of the 33 patients, 10 patients survived to LVAD implant, 1 was bridged directly to transplant, 5 weaned from ECLS, and 16 died on ECLS. Overall, 12 patients survived to discharge. One-year actuarial survival from the initiation of ECLS was 36%. One-year actuarial survival from the time of LVAD implant, conditional on surviving ECLS, was 80%. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year survival of adult patients placed on ECLS and who subsequently survived to an implantable LVAD was favorable. These data support a strategy of ECLS to implantable LVAD bridge to heart transplant in adult patients who are in need of circulatory support and who are not initially candidates for other forms of mechanical support. The favorable results of this strategy support utilization of ECLS even in situations where myocardial recovery is thought to be unlikely.

Extracorporeal Circulation↗

PubMed2001

Extracorporeal plasma treatment in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome: a review.

This review summarizes the state of the art of apheresis in hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Both entities are characterized by thrombotic microangiopathy, hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytopenia. While HUS often presents with renal insufficiency, cerebral involvement is more common in TTP. Recently, in TTP, a primary or secondary lack of activity of a von Willebrand factor (vWF) degrading enzyme was made responsible for the presence of unusually large vWF multimers causing platelet aggregation and thrombus formation in the microvasculature. In contrast, in familial HUS, a factor H deficiency with uninhibited complement activation seems to play a role. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) using fresh frozen plasma or cryosupernatant as the substitution fluid is indicated in acute TTP and atypical HUS without antecedent diarrhea. As a rule, it will show good effectiveness, especially in the former entity. HUS in pregnancy should be treated by instant delivery whereas postpartum HUS may resolve using protracted courses of TPE. In contrast, in thrombotic microangiopathy after bone marrow transplantation as well as in HUS due to cancer, mitomycin C, or after renal transplantation, TPE is of questionable value and indicated only as a last resort treatment.

Extracorporeal Circulation↗