PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7036893

Selective limbotomy.

J A Picaza·S E Hunter
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A method is designed dividing the limbic system into sectors. The method was tested by analyzing 50 procedures carried out by the authors. Rostral limbotomies, performed either by open techniques (cingulectomy) or by stereotactic surgery, showed similar results, although recurrence was more frequent with stereotaxis. Comparison with other described procedures on the same areas revealed similar results. Analysis suggests that the interruption of the cingulum was responsible for the permanent behavior modification and not the interruption of intersecting anatomical systems.

Explore related subjects

Follow-Up StudiesHumansLimbic SystemMental DisordersPsychosurgeryStereotaxic TechniquesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Picaza, S E Hunter. 1982. Selective limbotomy.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000101677

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

[Factors influencing neurological care].

OBJECTIVE: To analyse certain factors which contribute to the existing backlog in specialised neurological care, such as: where the patient was referred from, the reason for the appointment, tests carried out and the final diagnosis. We used a random sample of patients. DESIGN: Retrospective study of patients referred from Primary Care, who were attended as out-patients in the Neurology clinic during 1991. SITE. Health Area 2 of the Autonomous Community of Madrid. MAIN MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The average number of patients per doctor sent from each one of the seven Centres studied was 7.69, with outliers of between 2 and 21, with a standard deviation of 3.95 and a rate of 51.31%. The proportion of new patients to patients having follow-up checks was 2 to 3, respectively. The differences between the number of patients sent from the different centres were found in the less serious pathologies. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the criteria used by Primary Care professionals and specialists should be strengthened and unified. This was one of the factors which weighed most on the quality and backlog of care.

Follow-Up Studies↗