PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7062416

Staging errors in clinically localized prostatic cancer.

Abstract

The interrelationships among tumor grade, local tumor extension, lymph node involvement and early treatment failure were examined in 96 consecutive patients with clinical stage A (11 patients) or B (85 patients) prostatic cancer who were considered potential candidates for radical prostatectomy. In this series 20 of the 82 patients (24 per cent) who underwent radical prostatectomy had local tumor extension beyond the prostatic capsule and 27 of the 88 patients (31 per cent) who had lymph node dissections had nodal involvement. Of the entire group of 96 patients 38 (40 per cent) had either local extension and/or nodal involvement. A direct correlation was observed between clinical stage and the incidence of local tumor extension but not between clinical stage and nodal involvement. However, there was a striking correlation between surgical stage and lymph node involvement in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. A direct correlation also was observed between tumor grade, and local extension and nodal involvement. Analysis of multiple parameters revealed that clinical grade of tumor considered together were more predictive of nodal involvement than either parameter alone. Early treatment failures occurred in 5 patients, all of whom were understaged clinically.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W J Catalona, A J Stein. 1982. Staging errors in clinically localized prostatic cancer.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53862-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Posttreatment follow-up of radiation oncology patients in a managed care environment.

PURPOSE: Health care delivery in the United States is in the midst of a structural revolution called managed care. Demands for cost control within the managed care environment force radiation oncologists to defend the need and obligation to follow their patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We have analyzed this follow-up requirement from six potential justifications: patient care, medical-legal, quality assurance, outcome measurement, cost, and improvement of care. RESULTS: Practical recommendations for discussing the need for follow-up with the medical directors and primary care physicians of managed care entities are given. Follow-up without valid documentation of benefit is hard to justify in this era of managed care. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative follow-up between the referring physician, the treating radiation oncologist, and the other oncologic specialists will allow for outcome measurement and improvement in practice without driving up cost or exposing the patient to undue risk.

Follow-Up Studies

[Partial or total stripping of the great saphenous vein. 5-year recurrence frequency and 3-year frequency of neural complications after partial and total stripping of the great saphenous vein].

One hundred and sixty-three patients with primary long saphenous vein varices were randomized to either classical (total) stripping of the long saphenous vein (n = 84) or partial stripping, i.e. only of the femoral part of the vein (n = 79). Permanent nerve lesions were evaluated clinically three years and recurrence of varicosities evaluated five years postoperatively. It was found that 24 patients (29%) who had total stripping performed had permanent lesions of the saphenous nerve, whereas only four of the patients (5%) who had partial stripping of the vein had lasting nerve lesions (p < 0.01). Ten percent of patients in both groups had recurrence of varicosities. The present - one and only - long-term, randomized study of different stripping procedures shows that stripping the long saphenous vein below the knee increases the permanent nervedamage six-fold without reducing long-term recurrency. Total stripping of the long saphenous vein should be abandoned as a routine in varicose vein surgery.

Follow-Up Studies