PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7070311

Interdisciplinary field training research and rural development programme.

Abstract

The programme outlined is an interdisciplinary activity involving students working as groups in villages. It runs through the educational programme in summer blocks of 6 weeks each. It blends medical education with rural development and it is hoped to develop in students team-work and community orientation as well as research skills. The purpose of the communication is to exchange ideas in this field and hopefully receive some comments and views from readers and at the same time pave the way for support, financial or otherwise.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Hamad. 1982. Interdisciplinary field training research and rural development programme.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1982.tb01234.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[The QUALI Project: a quality study of the structure of the primary care teams (PCT) of Catalonia. The Quality Improvement Commission of the Societat Catalana de Medicina Familiar i Comunitària].

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the compliance with the primary health care quality criteria of the Committee for Quality Improvement of the Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: Reformed primary care centres (PCC) in Catalonia (186), of which 73 (39.2%) filled out the disk with the results. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 202 criteria, divided into five sections (structure and material resources, human resources, work organisation, systems of recording and access, and continuity, confidentiality and participation), were self-evaluated in each PCC. These criteria were defined as basic or optimal and compliance with them was graded from 1 to 4. 72.8% of the criteria were fully complied with. In 7.4% there was partial compliance, and in 19.7% non-compliance. The basic criteria had 74% total compliance, whereas the optimal criteria had 51.9%. The groups with least compliance (sum of the total plus the partial) were records systems (68.6%) and human resources (73.5%). The organisation group had the best compliance (85.5%). By sub-groups, the greatest compliance was found in privacy (93.7%), direct care (89.2%) and recording actions (89.1%). Sub-groups with least compliance were long-term treatments (61.8%), vaccinations (46.4%) and storage (42%). Eight of the 18 criteria not complied with by 50% or more were considered responsibility of the team. There was 37.8% total compliance and 24% partial in the criteria referring to the specific training of primary care professionals. Up to 80% non-compliance was found in quality of long-term prescription records, vaccinations and storage. CONCLUSIONS: The high level of compliance in the sections which depend most on professionals should be noted (accessibility-continuity and organisation). This study is a first approach towards understanding the quality of the structure of PC in Catalonia, and enables proposals for improvement to be set up.

Community Medicine

First step: report on a pilot course for personal and professional development.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a pilot course in personal and professional development, entitled 'Becoming a doctor: the first step' and our suggestions for what might be incorporated into future courses. SETTING AND CONTEXT: Leeds Medical School begins a new curriculum in September 1999 with a proportion of the first 3 years being devoted to a new module on personal and professional development. This module will include courses involving communication skills, ethics, working in groups and early patient contact through community visits. Some of these topics were piloted in a short course for first-year medical students in 1998. LEARNING METHODS: The course ran for 9 weeks and was largely experiential. The group facilitators came from diverse health and social care backgrounds. A variety of learning methods were used, concentrating on self-reflection, discussion, community visits and information gathering. EVIDENCE FOR EFFECTIVENESS: The views of both facilitators and students were analysed. Students particularly appreciated the community visits and group work. The facilitators were positive about the course overall while suggesting improvements, including their own involvement in future development of the course. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot course has helped us to focus on objectives for the new curriculum and to plan the new course. In particular there is a need for more attention to be given to the involvement of facilitators in course development.

Community Medicine