PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7071029

Examination for cervical masses.

Abstract

Identification of cervical masses requires careful systematic examination of the head and neck. Important landmarks and major glands and muscles should be palpated and the upper aerodigestive tract examined with a mirror. If a mass is found and the cause is unclear, certain factors should be considered: the patient's age and history, the physical findings, and the location of the mass. Any mass of unknown cause that fails to respond to treatment within two to three weeks requires endoscopic evaluation of the mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract and subsequent open biopsy. Such an aggressive approach will spare the patient inappropriate delays in determining definitive diagnosis and avoid inappropriate biopsy of a metastatic node containing squamous cell carcinoma primary to the aerodigestive tract. This results in optimum care of a patient with a cervical mass.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S R Rood, J T Johnson. 1982. Examination for cervical masses.. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1982.11716051

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗