PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7087887

Topical acyclovir for herpes simplex.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1982-06-11. Topical acyclovir for herpes simplex.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7087887/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sensitivity of L-(-)2,3-dideoxythiacytidine resistant hepatitis B virus to other antiviral nucleoside analogues.

L-(-)2',3'-Dideoxythiacytidine (L(-)SddC, Lamivudine) resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) develops in patients after prolonged treatment. Point mutations detected in the viral genome from these patients have been shown to be responsible for L(-)SddC resistance. Therefore, new drugs active against L(-)SddC resistant HBV are needed. Using a transient transfection system, we studied the sensitivity of L(-)SddC resistant HBV to other anti-HBV nucleoside analogues. It was found that the L526M mutation alone caused greater resistance to penciclovir (PCV) than did the V553I mutation alone. Both mutations also caused the virus to be less sensitive to L(-)SddC and 2'-fluoro-5-methyl-beta-L-arabinofuranosyluracil (L-FMAU), although the degree of resistance was much less than that to PCV. The A546V mutation had no impact on the sensitivity to L(-)SddC, L-FMAU, and PCV. When these single mutations were coupled with the M550V/I mutation, all the double mutants were resistant to those drugs. Although 2',3'-dideoxy-2',3'-didehydro-beta-L(-)-5-fluorocytidine (L(-)Fd4C) was also less active, the IC50 of L(-)Fd4C against the L(-)SddC resistant mutant was at least fifty times lower than that against cell growth in culture. DNA polymerase associated with L(-)SddC resistant virions was also found to be less sensitive than that with wild-type HBV to those L-nucleoside triphosphates. All the L(-)SddC resistant mutants were still sensitive to 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)-adenine (PMEA). These results suggest that different mutations in the HBV genome have a different impact on its sensitivity to those compounds, and L(-)SddC resistant HBV may also be resistant to PCV, L-FMAU, and L(-)Fd4C. A nucleoside analogue less toxic than PMEA could be developed against L(-)SddC resistant HBV.

Acyclovir

Valacyclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation. International Valacyclovir Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis Transplantation Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a major complication of organ transplantation. We hypothesized that prophylactic treatment with valacyclovir would reduce the risk of CMV disease. METHODS: A total of 208 CMV-negative recipients of a kidney from a seropositive donor and 408 CMV-positive recipients were randomly assigned to receive either 2 g of valacyclovir or placebo orally four times daily for 90 days after transplantation, with the dose adjusted according to renal function. The primary end point was laboratory-confirmed CMV disease in the first six months after transplantation. RESULTS: Treatment with valacyclovir reduced the incidence or delayed the onset of CMV disease in both the seronegative patients (P<0.001) and the seropositive patients (P=0.03). Among the seronegative patients, the incidence of CMV disease 90 days after transplantation was 45 percent among placebo recipients and 3 percent among valacyclovir recipients. Among the seropositive patients, the respective values were 6 percent and 0 percent. At six months, the incidence of CMV disease was 45 percent among seronegative recipients of placebo and 16 percent among seronegative recipients of valacyclovir; it was 6 percent among seropositive placebo recipients and 1 percent among seropositive valacyclovir recipients. At six months, the rate of biopsy-confirmed acute graft rejection in the seronegative group was 52 percent among placebo recipients and 26 percent among valacyclovir recipients (P=0.001). Treatment with valacyclovir also decreased the rates of CMV viremia and viruria, herpes simplex virus disease, and the use of inpatient medical resources. Hallucinations and confusion were more common with valacyclovir treatment, but these events were not severe or treatment-limiting. The rates of other adverse events were similar among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic treatment with valacyclovir is a safe and effective way to prevent CMV disease after renal transplantation.

Acyclovir

Acyclovir treatment of experimentally induced herpes simplex virus encephalitis: monitoring the changes in immunologic NO synthase expression and viral load within brain tissue of SJL mice.

The effect of acyclovir treatment on viral burden and the expression of immunologic nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) within brains of 42 HSV-1 F infected mice was studied by using a titration PCR assay for HSV-1 DNA and a semiquantitative RT-PCR for iNOS mRNA. iNOS mediated NO-production may possibly be involved in secondary mechanisms of brain injury following virus infection, which may account for treatment failures in human herpes simplex virus encephalitis (HSVE). Following infection, a parallel increase of iNOS mRNA and HSV-1F-DNA occurred with peaks after 7 days that were both significantly lower under acyclovir treatment. Six months post infection viral load had declined, but iNOS mRNA expression in both treated and untreated mice was still enhanced as compared with mock infected controls. This suggests that acyclovir decreases iNOS expression via inhibition of viral replication shortly after infection but fails to influence elevated iNOS within the brain late in the course of experimental HSVE.

Acyclovir