PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7135840

Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements.

Abstract

Four experiments are reported in which saccadic eye movements are examined when the eye moves to targets in peripheral vision which consist of two discrete stimuli. It is found that under a variety of conditions, the saccade amplitude is such that the saccade lands at an intermediate position between the stimuli. This result has been termed the global effect and is interpreted as an influence of the global target configuration on the saccade amplitude. It is suggested that this phenomenon may be explicable in terms of activity in an ensemble of cells with large receptive fields. The experiments demonstrate the global effect in the situations of rapid automatic tracking, scanning for target detail and comparison of target configurations. The effect depends in a systematic quantitative manner on the properties of the visual stimuli. This may be loosely described by saying the saccade is directed to the centre of gravity of the target configuration. The saccades are however in general directed closer to the near target than predicted by the geometric centre of gravity. Although the effect appears in a similar form in all the conditions tested, minor differences do occur. It is also shown that the effect shows a dependence on the latency of the saccade, being most pronounced for saccades with short latencies. It is suggested that this may be a consequence of the dynamics of visual information processing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Findlay. 1982. Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(82)90040-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

On the role of extraretinal signals for saccade generation.

We investigated the accuracy of sequential saccadic eye movements, executed without visual feed-back. We found evidence that the final error of one saccade is corrected during the next, which supports the existence of extraretinal inputs to the saccadic generator. The corrections, however, were incomplete, which suggests that extraretinal signals are only partially effective.

Eye Movements

Visual fixation of a target and suppression of optokinetic nystagmus: effects of varying target feedback.

The ability to maintain foveal fixation of a target with either a stationary or moving background is often assumed to depend primarily on a difference (in velocity and/or position) between fovea and target. However, when subjects look at a target stabilized at the fovea presented against sinusoidal motion of an optokinetic stimulus field, optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) is suppressed. This suppression is not simply the absence of movement but instead most subjects show some amount of residual slow eye movements roughly counterphase to the field motion. We have varied the visual feedback of the target from 0 (stabilized) to -1 (stationary in space); as feedback increased, amplitude and phase lag of residual eye movements decreased systematically. The mechanism responsible for residual movements appears to operate for all feedback values (including the "real world" value of -1), which suggests a new view of the role played by retinal slip during fixation of a target and suppression of OKN.

Eye Movements